用模糊综合评判方法筛选甘蔗优良杂交组合

为直观地对甘蔗杂交组合进行筛选及评价,选择对甘蔗杂交组合优劣影响最大的四个因素（锤度、株高、茎径、有效茎）,以2009年广西甘蔗研究所实生苗的24个亲本杂交组合为研究对象,采用模糊综合评判方法,研究锤度、株高、茎径、有效茎的相互作用对24个甘蔗杂交组合的影响,从中筛选出优的甘蔗杂交组合1个（ROC24×粤糖91-976）,较优的甘蔗杂交组合10个（ROC1×ROC22、ROC1×桂糖96-211、桂糖92-66×湛蔗92-126、粤糖91-976×ROC1、桂糖92-66×福农91-4621、桂糖94-119×CP74-383、粤糖89-113×HoCP93-750、ROC10×崖城94-46...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in西南农业学报 Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 396 - 400
Main Author 谭芳 黎焕光 王伦旺 杨荣仲 李松 蓝桃菊 黄海荣 唐仕云 李翔 黄家雍 贤武 经艳 郑书斌 余凤良
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 广西甘蔗研究所,广西南宁530007%广西农业科学院,广西南宁,530007%广西农垦国有金光农场,广西南宁,530042 2012
中国农业科学院甘蔗研究中心,广西南宁530007
Subjects
杂交组合
模糊综合评判
甘蔗
筛选
甘蔗
杂交组合
筛选
模糊综合评判
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1001-4829
DOI10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2012.02.009

Cover

More Information
Summary:为直观地对甘蔗杂交组合进行筛选及评价,选择对甘蔗杂交组合优劣影响最大的四个因素（锤度、株高、茎径、有效茎）,以2009年广西甘蔗研究所实生苗的24个亲本杂交组合为研究对象,采用模糊综合评判方法,研究锤度、株高、茎径、有效茎的相互作用对24个甘蔗杂交组合的影响,从中筛选出优的甘蔗杂交组合1个（ROC24×粤糖91-976）,较优的甘蔗杂交组合10个（ROC1×ROC22、ROC1×桂糖96-211、桂糖92-66×湛蔗92-126、粤糖91-976×ROC1、桂糖92-66×福农91-4621、桂糖94-119×CP74-383、粤糖89-113×HoCP93-750、ROC10×崖城94-46、崖城99-31×ROC22、桂糖92-66×桂糖00-245）,这些组合可用到今后的育种实践。
Bibliography:51-1213/S
Sugarcane; Cross combination; Fuzzy comprehensive judgment; Screening
Brix,stalk height,stalk diameter,and number of millable stalks were the four main parameters that determine the quality of sugarcane cross combinations.In order to screen out elite sugarcane cross combinations for future breeding programs,the four parameters were tested and then analyzed by fuzzy comprehensive judgment method in seed seedlings of 24 sugarcane cross combinations from the Hybrid Nursery of Guangxi Sugarcane Research Institute.The results showed that,ROC24×YT91-976 was the best combination,and another 10 combinations were good viz.,ROC1×ROC22,ROC1×GT96-211,GT92-66×Zhanzhe92-126,YT91-976×ROC1,GT92-66×Funong91-4621,GT94-119×CP74-383,YT89-113×HoCP93-750,ROC10×Yacheng94-46,Yacheng99-31×ROC22 and GT92-66×GT00-245.These above-mentioned cross combinations could be planted for future breeding practice.
TAN Fang,LI Huan-guang,WANG Lun-wang,YANG Rong-zhong,LI Song,LAN Tao-ju,HUANG Hai-rong,TANG Shi-yun,LI Xiang,HUANG Jia-yong,XIA
ISSN:1001-4829
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2012.02.009