Outcome evaluation in shoulder surgery using 3D kinematics sensors

A new method of scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder is presented. 3D accelerometers and gyroscopes attached on the humerus were used to differentiate a healthy from a painful shoulder. The method was first tested on 10 healthy volunteer subjects with no shoulder pathology....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGait & posture Vol. 25; no. 4; pp. 523 - 532
Main Authors Coley, Brian, Jolles, Brigitte M., Farron, Alain, Bourgeois, Aline, Nussbaumer, François, Pichonnaz, Claude, Aminian, Kamiar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier B.V 01.04.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0966-6362
1879-2219
DOI10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.06.016

Cover

More Information
Summary:A new method of scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder is presented. 3D accelerometers and gyroscopes attached on the humerus were used to differentiate a healthy from a painful shoulder. The method was first tested on 10 healthy volunteer subjects with no shoulder pathology. The system was then tested on 10 patients with unilateral shoulder pathology (rotator cuff disease, osteoarthritis) before and after surgery (3, 6 months). In order to evaluate the system, nine tests based on the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) were performed on each shoulder for each patient. Three scores were defined: the P score was based on the angular velocities and accelerations of the humerus; the RAV score was based only on the angular velocities of the humerus; the M score was based on the sum of all moments of the humerus. Our kinematic scores indicated significant differences between baseline and follow-up ( p < 0.05) and differentiated between patients with varying severity of the same condition. We demonstrated a reliable technique of evaluating shoulder pathology and the results of surgery.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0966-6362
1879-2219
DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.06.016