真性红细胞增多症和原发性血小板增多症后骨髓纤维化患者的预后研究

目的评估适用于原发性骨髓化(PMF)患者的国际预后积分系统(IPSS)、动态国际预后积分系统(DIPSS)、修订的动态国际预后积分系统(DIPSS plus)、基于我国PMF患者临床特征提出的修订IPSS(IPSS-Chinese)、修订DIPSS(DIPSS-Chinese)及针对欧美真性红细胞增多症(PV)后骨髓纤维化(post-PV MF)和原发性血小板增多症(ET)后骨髓纤维化(post-ET MF)患者制定的继发性骨髓纤维化预后模型(MYSEC-PM)对我国post-PV MF和post-ET MF患者的预后效力,并探讨post-PV/ET MF患者的预后因素。方法回顾性分析1984...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in中华血液学杂志 Vol. 37; no. 10; pp. 876 - 880
Main Author 陈猛 徐泽锋 徐俊卿 李冰 张培红 秦铁军 张悦 王静雅 张宏丽 方力维 潘丽娟 胡耐博 曲士强 肖志坚
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 300020天津,中国医学科学院、北京协和医学院血液学研究所、血液病医院 2016
实验血液学国家重点实验室
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0253-2727
DOI10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.10.012

Cover

More Information
Summary:目的评估适用于原发性骨髓化(PMF)患者的国际预后积分系统(IPSS)、动态国际预后积分系统(DIPSS)、修订的动态国际预后积分系统(DIPSS plus)、基于我国PMF患者临床特征提出的修订IPSS(IPSS-Chinese)、修订DIPSS(DIPSS-Chinese)及针对欧美真性红细胞增多症(PV)后骨髓纤维化(post-PV MF)和原发性血小板增多症(ET)后骨髓纤维化(post-ET MF)患者制定的继发性骨髓纤维化预后模型(MYSEC-PM)对我国post-PV MF和post-ET MF患者的预后效力,并探讨post-PV/ET MF患者的预后因素。方法回顾性分析1984年3月至2013年12月期间连续收治的55例post-PV/ET MF患者的临床资料,使用IPSS、DIPSS、DIPSS plus、IPSS-Chinese、DIPSS-Chinese和MYSEC-PM对患者进行预后分组及评估,并对可能的预后因素进行分析。结果55例post-PV/ET MF患者中男20例、女35例,中位年龄59(20-88)岁。post-PV MF 32例(58.2%),post-ET MF 23例(41.8%)。诊断PV/ET至转化为MF的中位时间为7.8(1.1-23.4)年。所有患者中位随访37(1-156)个月,44例(80.0%)存活,11例(20.0%)死亡,中位生存时间为110.0(95% CI 87.5-132.8)个月。采用IPSS、DIPSS、DIPSS plus、IPSS-Chinese及MYSEC-PM对患者进行预后分组,各组患者的生存预后差异均无统计学意义(P〉 0.05)。单因素分析示HGB〈100 g/L是post-PV/ET MF患者的不良预后因素(P=0.003)。结论适用于PMF患者的IPSS、DIPSS、DIPSS plus、IPSS-Chinese及MYSEC-PM不能准确地对我国post-PV/ET MF患者进行预后分组。HGB〈100 g/L是post-PV/ET MF患者的不良预后因素,可作为制定治疗方案的参考。
Bibliography:Polycythemia vera; Thrombocythemia, essential; Myelofibrosis; Prognostic scoring system
Chen Meng, Xu Zefeng, Xu Junqing, Li Bing, Zhang Peihong, Qin Tiejun, Zhang Yue, Wang Jingya, Zhang Hongli, Fang Liwei, Pan Lijuan, Hu Naibo, Qu Shiqiang, Xiao Zhijian. (Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, CAMS & PUMC, the State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Tianjin 300020, China)
ObjectiveTo evaluate the performances of the prognostic scoring systems devised for primary myelofibrosis(PMF)and the new developed MYSEC-PM(Mysec Prognostic Model)and investigate the risk factors in Chinese patients with post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis(post-PV/ET MF). The most widely used prognostic scoring systems in PMF included the International Prognostic Scoring System(IPSS), dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System(DIPSS), refined DIPSS(DIPSS plus), modified IPSS for Chinese(IPSS-Chinese), and modified DIPSS for Chinese(DIPSS-Chinese).MethodsThe clinic
ISSN:0253-2727
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.10.012