Use of satiety peptides in assessing the satiating capacity of foods

Foods differ in their satiating capacity. Satiety peptides may help to provide evidence for biological mechanisms behind these differences. The aim of this paper was to discuss the physiological relevance of three individual appetite peptides, i.e. CCK, GLP-1 and PYY, in assessing the satiating capa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysiology & behavior Vol. 105; no. 2; pp. 483 - 488
Main Authors Mars, Monica, Stafleu, Annette, de Graaf, Cees
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 18.01.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0031-9384
1873-507X
1873-507X
DOI10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.033

Cover

More Information
Summary:Foods differ in their satiating capacity. Satiety peptides may help to provide evidence for biological mechanisms behind these differences. The aim of this paper was to discuss the physiological relevance of three individual appetite peptides, i.e. CCK, GLP-1 and PYY, in assessing the satiating capacity of foods. A literature research was conducted on CCK, GLP-1, PYY and satiety; effective exogenous infusion studies and endogenous production studies, i.e. changes induced by foods, were identified. The relative changes in blood concentrations in these studies were compared in order to assess an indication of the physiological relevance of the peptides. Relative changes in the two types of studies investigating CCK overlapped, i.e. increases in serum were 3 to 14-fold in effective exogenous studies (n=7) and 2 to 8-fold in endogenous production studies (n=9). The relative changes in GLP-1 and PYY did not overlap; GLP-1: 4 to 16 fold in effective exogenous studies (n=4) and no effect to 4 fold in endogenous production studies (n=38). PYY: 3 to 11-fold in effective exogenous studies (n=14) and no effect to 2-fold in endogenous production studies (n=10). GLP-1 and PYY show effects on satiety at supra-physiological dosages, they are not likely to contribute individually to a difference in satiating capacity of foods and can therefore not be interpreted in isolation. The effects of CCK are likely to be in the physiological range and therefore may have an individual contribution to a difference in satiating capacity between foods.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.033
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0031-9384
1873-507X
1873-507X
DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.033