A Review of Mathematical Models for Tumor Dynamics and Treatment Resistance Evolution of Solid Tumors

Increasing knowledge of intertumor heterogeneity, intratumor heterogeneity, and cancer evolution has improved the understanding of anticancer treatment resistance. A better characterization of cancer evolution and subsequent use of this knowledge for personalized treatment would increase the chance...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCPT: pharmacometrics and systems pharmacology Vol. 8; no. 10; pp. 720 - 737
Main Authors Yin, Anyue, Moes, Dirk Jan A.R., Hasselt, Johan G.C., Swen, Jesse J., Guchelaar, Henk‐Jan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.10.2019
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2163-8306
2163-8306
DOI10.1002/psp4.12450

Cover

More Information
Summary:Increasing knowledge of intertumor heterogeneity, intratumor heterogeneity, and cancer evolution has improved the understanding of anticancer treatment resistance. A better characterization of cancer evolution and subsequent use of this knowledge for personalized treatment would increase the chance to overcome cancer treatment resistance. Model‐based approaches may help achieve this goal. In this review, we comprehensively summarized mathematical models of tumor dynamics for solid tumors and of drug resistance evolution. Models displayed by ordinary differential equations, algebraic equations, and partial differential equations for characterizing tumor burden dynamics are introduced and discussed. As for tumor resistance evolution, stochastic and deterministic models are introduced and discussed. The results may facilitate a novel model‐based analysis on anticancer treatment response and the occurrence of resistance, which incorporates both tumor dynamics and resistance evolution. The opportunities of a model‐based approach as discussed in this review can be of great benefit for future optimizing and personalizing anticancer treatment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:2163-8306
2163-8306
DOI:10.1002/psp4.12450