Surveillance of Plasmodium vivax transmission using serological models in the border areas of China–Myanmar
Background To understand the Plasmodium vivax malaria transmission intensity and to assess the effectiveness of prevention and control measures taken along the China–Myanmar border, a catalytic model was used to calculate the seroconversion rate, an important indicator of malaria transmission intens...
Saved in:
Published in | Malaria journal Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 69 - 9 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central
03.03.2022
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1475-2875 1475-2875 |
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-022-04096-8 |
Cover
Summary: | Background
To understand the
Plasmodium vivax
malaria transmission intensity and to assess the effectiveness of prevention and control measures taken along the China–Myanmar border, a catalytic model was used to calculate the seroconversion rate, an important indicator of malaria transmission intensity with high sensitivity, which is particularly useful in areas of low transmission.
Methods
Five counties in Yunnan Province bordering Myanmar were selected as survey sites, and subjects were obtained in each county by stratified random sampling in 2013–2014. Fingerstick blood was collected from each subject and tested for antibodies to
P. vivax
Merozoite Surface Protein 1-19 (PvMSP1-19) using indirect ELISA. A catalytic conversion model was used to assess the transmission intensity of
P. vivax
malaria based on the maximum likelihood of generating a community seroconversion rate.
Results
A total of 3064 valid blood samples were collected. Antibody levels were positively correlated with age. The seroconversion rate (SCR) values for each village were Luoping (0.0054), Jingqiao (0.0061), Longpen (0.0087), Eluo (0.0079), Banwang (0.0042) and Banbie (0.0046), respectively.
Conclusion
Overall, the intensity of
P. vivax
malaria transmission in the border areas of Yunnan Province is low and not entirely consistent across counties. Consecutive serological surveys are needed to provide a sensitive evaluation of transmission dynamics and can help to confirm areas where infection is no longer present. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1475-2875 1475-2875 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12936-022-04096-8 |