单孔与三孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术的临床疗效对比

目的对比单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术(Uniportal VATS)与三孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术(3-portal VATS)治疗肺癌的临床疗效。方法肺癌患者行单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术45例为单孔组,肺癌患者行三孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术53例为三孔组,比较2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数、切口长度、术后拔管时间、术后疼痛评分、术后住院天数、并发症发生率及患者满意度评分等。结果单孔组与三孔组术中出血量[(128.75±18.32)m L vs(129.15±17.69)m L]、淋巴结清扫数[(13.33±1.05)枚vs(13.12±1.38)枚]、术后拔管时间[(4.90±0.75)d vs(4.75±...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in天津医药 Vol. 44; no. 1; pp. 101 - 104
Main Author 晋云鹏 卢喜科 张逊 周方 袁丽娜
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 天津医科大学研究生院 300070%天津市胸科医院胸外科 2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0253-9896
DOI10.11958/20150073

Cover

More Information
Summary:目的对比单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术(Uniportal VATS)与三孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术(3-portal VATS)治疗肺癌的临床疗效。方法肺癌患者行单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术45例为单孔组,肺癌患者行三孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术53例为三孔组,比较2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数、切口长度、术后拔管时间、术后疼痛评分、术后住院天数、并发症发生率及患者满意度评分等。结果单孔组与三孔组术中出血量[(128.75±18.32)m L vs(129.15±17.69)m L]、淋巴结清扫数[(13.33±1.05)枚vs(13.12±1.38)枚]、术后拔管时间[(4.90±0.75)d vs(4.75±0.70)d]、术后住院天数[(7.52±1.16)d vs(7.55±1.10)d]、并发症发生率(20.0%vs 20.8%)等比较差异均无统计学意义。单孔组在切口长度[(5.36±0.22)cm vs(7.44±0.35)cm]、术后第1天疼痛评分[6.47±0.54 vs 6.86±0.52]、第3天疼痛评分[3.59±0.29 vs4.05±0.25]、患者满意度评分[91.03±2.62 vs 88.35±2.97]等方面均优于三孔组(均P〈0.05),单孔组的手术时间较三孔组[(143.81±17.97)min vs(130.11±15.03)min]略有延长(P〈0.05)。结论单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术治疗肺癌安全、有效,较传统三孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术创伤更小,疼痛更轻,患者满意度更高。
Bibliography:pneumonectomy; thoracoscopy; uniportal VATS;3-portal VATS; lobectomy; lung cancer
JIN Yunpeng, LU Xike, ZHANG Xun, ZHOU Fang, YUAN Li'na( 1 Graduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China; 2 Tianjin Chest Hospital)
Objective To compare the clinical effects between uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and 3- portal VATS lobectomy for patients with lung cancer. Methods Patients were divided into uniportal VATS lobectomy group (n=45) and 3-portal VATS lobectomy group (n=53). The clinical data were compared between two groups, including the oper- ation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissection, length of incision, postoperative extubation time, post- operative pain score and postoperative hospitalization. Results There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood lose (128.75±18.32) mL vs (129.15±17.69) mL, lymph node dissection number (13.33±1.05) vs (13.12±1.38), duration of chest drainage (4.90±0.75)d vs (4.75±0.70)d, duration of hospital stay (7.5
ISSN:0253-9896
DOI:10.11958/20150073