Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Despite advances in treatment, mortality in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) remains high. Short-term mechanical circulatory support devices acutely improve hemodynamic conditions. The aim of this study was to determine whether a new percutaneous mechanical cir...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 69; no. 3; pp. 278 - 287
Main Authors Ouweneel, Dagmar M., Eriksen, Erlend, Sjauw, Krischan D., van Dongen, Ivo M., Hirsch, Alexander, Packer, Erik J.S., Vis, M. Marije, Wykrzykowska, Joanna J., Koch, Karel T., Baan, Jan, de Winter, Robbert J., Piek, Jan J., Lagrand, Wim K., de Mol, Bas A.J.M., Tijssen, Jan G.P., Henriques, José P.S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 24.01.2017
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.022

Cover

More Information
Summary:Despite advances in treatment, mortality in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) remains high. Short-term mechanical circulatory support devices acutely improve hemodynamic conditions. The aim of this study was to determine whether a new percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) device (Impella CP, Abiomed, Danvers, Massachusetts) decreases 30-day mortality when compared with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with severe shock complicating AMI. In a randomized, prospective, open-label, multicenter trial, 48 patients with severe CS complicating AMI were assigned to pMCS (n = 24) or IABP (n = 24). Severe CS was defined as systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or the need for inotropic or vasoactive medication and the requirement for mechanical ventilation. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. At 30 days, mortality in patients treated with either IABP or pMCS was similar (50% and 46%, respectively; hazard ratio with pMCS: 0.96; 95% confidence interval: 0.42 to 2.18; p = 0.92). At 6 months, mortality rates for both pMCS and IABP were 50% (hazard ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 0.47 to 2.32; p = 0.923). In this explorative randomized controlled trial involving mechanically ventilated patients with CS after AMI, routine treatment with pMCS was not associated with reduced 30-day mortality compared with IABP. (IMPRESS in Severe Shock; NTR3450) [Display omitted]
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.022