Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of the relationship between task‐related hemodynamic responses and cortical excitability

Investigating the relationship between task‐related hemodynamic responses and cortical excitability is challenging because it requires simultaneous measurement of hemodynamic responses while applying noninvasive brain stimulation. Moreover, cortical excitability and task‐related hemodynamic response...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman brain mapping Vol. 44; no. 3; pp. 876 - 900
Main Authors Cai, Zhengchen, Pellegrino, Giovanni, Lina, Jean‐Marc, Benali, Habib, Grova, Christophe
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 15.02.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1065-9471
1097-0193
1097-0193
DOI10.1002/hbm.26107

Cover

More Information
Summary:Investigating the relationship between task‐related hemodynamic responses and cortical excitability is challenging because it requires simultaneous measurement of hemodynamic responses while applying noninvasive brain stimulation. Moreover, cortical excitability and task‐related hemodynamic responses are both associated with inter‐/intra‐subject variability. To reliably assess such a relationship, we applied hierarchical Bayesian modeling. This study involved 16 healthy subjects who underwent simultaneous Paired Associative Stimulation (PAS10, PAS25, Sham) while monitoring brain activity using functional Near‐Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS), targeting the primary motor cortex (M1). Cortical excitability was measured by Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs), and the motor task‐related hemodynamic responses were measured using fNIRS 3D reconstructions. We constructed three models to investigate: (1) PAS effects on the M1 excitability, (2) PAS effects on fNIRS hemodynamic responses to a finger tapping task, and (3) the correlation between PAS effects on M1 excitability and PAS effects on task‐related hemodynamic responses. Significant increase in cortical excitability was found following PAS25, whereas a small reduction of the cortical excitability was shown after PAS10 and a subtle increase occurred after sham. Both HbO and HbR absolute amplitudes increased after PAS25 and decreased after PAS10. The probability of the positive correlation between modulation of cortical excitability and hemodynamic activity was 0.77 for HbO and 0.79 for HbR. We demonstrated that PAS stimulation modulates task‐related cortical hemodynamic responses in addition to M1 excitability. Moreover, the positive correlation between PAS modulations of excitability and hemodynamics brought insight into understanding the fundamental properties of cortical function and cortical excitability. We showed a high probability of positive correlations between cortical excitability and task‐related hemodynamic responses. This study also demonstrated the power of the Bayesian data analysis dealing with relatively high variability and small sample size data while providing informative inferences.
Bibliography:Funding information
Canadian Foundation for Innovation; Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Grant/Award Number: CIHR MOP 133619; Fonds de recherche du Québec ‐ Sante (FRQS) Doctoral Training Scholarship; FRQNT Research Team Grant; FRQS‐Quebec Bio‐Imaging Network (QBIN) Pilot Project grant; McGill/MNI ‐ Fred Andermann EEG and Epilepsy Fellowship; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant Program; NSERC Research Tools and Instrumentation Program; PERFORM Graduate Scholarship in Preventive Health Research; Strauss Canada Foundation
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Funding information Canadian Foundation for Innovation; Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Grant/Award Number: CIHR MOP 133619; Fonds de recherche du Québec ‐ Sante (FRQS) Doctoral Training Scholarship; FRQNT Research Team Grant; FRQS‐Quebec Bio‐Imaging Network (QBIN) Pilot Project grant; McGill/MNI ‐ Fred Andermann EEG and Epilepsy Fellowship; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant Program; NSERC Research Tools and Instrumentation Program; PERFORM Graduate Scholarship in Preventive Health Research; Strauss Canada Foundation
ISSN:1065-9471
1097-0193
1097-0193
DOI:10.1002/hbm.26107