A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies on major depression and BDNF levels: implications for the role of neuroplasticity in depression

Several clinical studies on major depressive disorder (MDD) have shown that blood brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) – a factor used to index neuroplasticity – is associated with depression response; however, the results are mixed. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether BDNF levels a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology Vol. 11; no. 8; pp. 1169 - 1180
Main Authors Brunoni, André Russowsky, Lopes, Mariana, Fregni, Felipe
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.12.2008
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1461-1457
1469-5111
1469-5111
DOI10.1017/S1461145708009309

Cover

More Information
Summary:Several clinical studies on major depressive disorder (MDD) have shown that blood brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) – a factor used to index neuroplasticity – is associated with depression response; however, the results are mixed. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether BDNF levels are correlated with improvement of depression. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, searching Medline, Cochrane Central, SciELO databases and reference lists from retrieved articles for clinical studies comparing mean BDNF blood levels in depressed patients pre- and post-antidepressant treatments or comparing depressed patients with healthy controls. Two reviewers independently searched for eligible studies and extracted outcome data using a structured form previously elaborated. Twenty articles, including 1504 subjects, met our inclusion criteria. The results showed that BDNF levels increased significantly after antidepressant treatment (effect size 0.62, 95% CI 0.36–0.88, random effects model). In addition, there was a significant correlation between changes in BDNF level and depression scores changes (p=0.02). Moreover, the results were robust according to the sensitivity analysis and Begg's funnel plot results did not suggest publication bias. Finally, there was a difference between pre-treatment patients and healthy controls (effect size 0.91, 95% CI 0.70–1.11) and a small but significant difference between treated patients and healthy controls (effect size 0.34, 95% CI 0.02–0.66). Our results show that BDNF levels are associated with clinical changes in depression; supporting the notion that depression improvement is associated with neuroplastic changes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-3
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ISSN:1461-1457
1469-5111
1469-5111
DOI:10.1017/S1461145708009309