Validity and reliability of serratus anterior hand held dynamometry

• Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 360 - 8
• Main Authors: IJspeert, Jos, Kerstens, Hans C. J. W., Janssen, Renske M. J., Geurts, Alexander C. H., van Alfen, Nens, Groothuis, Jan T.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 07.08.2019; BioMed Central Ltd; BMC
• Subjects: Abdominal muscles; Adult; Electromyography; Epidemiology; Female; Hard disk drives; Health aspects; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Internal Medicine; Isometric Contraction - physiology; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Muscle Strength; Muscle Strength Dynamometer; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Muscle-strength dynamometry; Orthopedics; Orthopedics and biomechanics; Physical fitness; Rehabilitation; Reproducibility of Results; Research Article; Rheumatology; Scapula; Serratus anterior; Shoulder - physiology; Shoulder Injuries - diagnosis; Sitting Position; Sports Medicine; Strength testing; Supine Position; Young Adult; Serratus anterior; Muscle strength dynamometer; Reproducibility of results; Scapula; Strength testing
• ISSN: 1471-2474; 1471-2474
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2741-7

Background Strength testing of the serratus anterior muscle with hand held dynamometry (HDD) in supine subjects has low reproducibility, and is influenced by compensatory activity of other muscles like the pectoralis major and upper trapezius. Previously, two manual maximum voluntary isometric contraction tests of the serratus anterior muscle were reported that recruited optimal surface electromyography (sEMG) activity in a sitting position. We adapted three manual muscle tests to make them suitable for HHD and investigated their validity and reliability. Methods Twenty-one healthy adults were examined by two assessors in one supine and two seated positions. Each test was repeated twice. Construct validity was determined by evaluating force production (assessed with HHD) in relation to sEMG of the serratus anterior, upper trapezius and pectoralis major muscles, comparing the three test positions. Intra- and interrater reliability were determined by calculating intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) smallest detectable change (SDC) and standard error of measurement (SEM). Results Serratus anterior muscle sEMG activity was most isolated in a seated position with the humerus in 90° anteflexion in the scapular plane. This resulted in the lowest measured force levels in this position with a mean force of 296 N (SEM 15.8 N). Intrarater reliability yielded an ICC of 0.658 (95% CI 0.325; 0.846) and an interrater reliability of 0.277 (95% CI -0.089;0.605). SDC was 127 Newton, SEM 45.8 Newton. Conclusion The results indicate that validity for strength testing of the serratus anterior muscle is optimal with subjects in a seated position and the shoulder flexed at 90° in the scapular plane. Intrarater reliability is moderate and interrater reliability of this procedure is poor. However the high SDC values make it difficult to use the measurement in repeated measurements.