Toward the development of transcriptional biodosimetry for the identification of irradiated individuals and assessment of absorbed radiation dose
The most frequently used and the best established method of biological dosimetry at present is the dicentric chromosome assay, which is poorly suitable for a mass casualties scenario. This gives rise to the need for the development of new, high-throughput assays for rapid identification of the subje...
Saved in:
Published in | Radiation and environmental biophysics Vol. 54; no. 3; pp. 353 - 363 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01.08.2015
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0301-634X 1432-2099 1432-2099 |
DOI | 10.1007/s00411-015-0603-8 |
Cover
Summary: | The most frequently used and the best established method of biological dosimetry at present is the dicentric chromosome assay, which is poorly suitable for a mass casualties scenario. This gives rise to the need for the development of new, high-throughput assays for rapid identification of the subjects exposed to ionizing radiation. In the present study, we tested the usefulness of gene expression analysis in blood cells for biological dosimetry. Human peripheral blood from three healthy donors was X-irradiated with doses of 0 (control), 0.6, and 2 Gy. The mRNA level of 16 genes (
ATF3
,
BAX
,
BBC3
,
BCL2
,
CDKN1A
,
DDB2
,
FDXR
,
GADD45A
,
GDF15
,
MDM2
,
PLK3
,
SERPINE1
,
SESN2
,
TNFRSF10B
,
TNFSF4
, and
VWCE
) was assessed by reverse transcription quantitative PCR 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after exposure with
ITFG1
and
DPM1
used as a reference genes. The panel of radiation-responsive genes was selected comprising
GADD45A
,
CDKN1A
,
BAX
,
BBC3
,
DDB2
,
TNFSF4
,
GDF15
, and
FDXR
. Cluster analysis showed that Δ
C
t
values of the selected genes contained sufficient information to allow discrimination between irradiated and non-irradiated blood samples. The samples were clearly grouped according to the absorbed doses of radiation and not to the time interval after irradiation or to the blood donor. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0301-634X 1432-2099 1432-2099 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00411-015-0603-8 |