Prospective phase II study of prophylactic low-dose azacitidine and donor lymphocyte infusions following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome
Thirty patients, with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 20) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, n = 10), were enrolled in a phase II trial entailing prophylactic post-transplant azacitidine (AZA) plus escalated doses of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). The median number of AZA cycles was 5...
Saved in:
Published in | Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke) Vol. 54; no. 11; pp. 1815 - 1826 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
01.11.2019
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0268-3369 1476-5365 1476-5365 |
DOI | 10.1038/s41409-019-0536-y |
Cover
Summary: | Thirty patients, with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML,
n
= 20) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS,
n
= 10), were enrolled in a phase II trial entailing prophylactic post-transplant azacitidine (AZA) plus escalated doses of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). The median number of AZA cycles was 5 (1–12) with 10 patients (33%) completing the 12 projected cycles. DLI were performed in 17 patients: 5 received one DLI, 2 received 2 DLI and 8 received 3 infusions. AZA was well tolerated, but discontinued in 20 patients primarily due to graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and relapse. The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade 1–3 acute GvHD was 31.5% and the chronic GvHD CI was 53% at 2 years. At a median follow-up of 49 months (27–63), 18 patients are alive. The overall and disease-free survivals are 65.5% (CI 95% = 48.2–82.8) at 2 years. Cause of death was mainly relapse for 9 patients. The median time to relapse was 7 months (2.5–58) and the cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 27.6% (CI 95% = 12.8–44.6). These results confirm that AZA is well tolerated as a prophylactic treatment to reduce the risk of post-transplantation relapse and compared favorably to those of patients who receive no post-transplant maintenance. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0268-3369 1476-5365 1476-5365 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41409-019-0536-y |