Assessing cardiometabolic risk in middle-aged adults using body mass index and waist–height ratio: are two indices better than one? A cross-sectional study

• Published in: Diabetology and metabolic syndrome Vol. 7; no. 1; p. 73
• Main Authors: Millar, Seán R., Perry, Ivan J., Phillips, Catherine M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 07.09.2015; BioMed Central Ltd; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Blood cell count; Body mass index; Cytokines; Diabetes; Endocrinology; Measurement; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Metabolic Diseases; Obesity; Prediabetic state; Proteins; Risk factors; Type 2 diabetes; Body mass index; Screening; Cardiometabolic risk; Waist–height ratio
• ISSN: 1758-5996; 1758-5996
• DOI: 10.1186/s13098-015-0069-5

Background A novel obesity classification method has been proposed using body mass index (BMI) and waist–height ratio (WHtR) together. However, the utility of this approach is unclear. In this study we compare the metabolic profiles in subjects defined as overweight or obese by both measures. We examine a range of metabolic syndrome features, pro-inflammatory cytokines, acute-phase response proteins, coagulation factors and white blood cell counts to determine whether a combination of both indices more accurately identifies individuals at increased obesity-related cardiometabolic risk. Methods This was a cross-sectional study involving a random sample of 1856 men and women aged 46–73 years. Metabolic and anthropometric profiles were assessed. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to compare lipid, lipoprotein, blood pressure, glycaemic and inflammatory biomarker levels between BMI and WHtR tertiles. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to determine cardiometabolic risk feature associations with BMI and WHtR groupings. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate index discriminatory ability. Results The combination of BMI and WHtR tertiles identified consistent metabolic variable differences relative to those characterised on the basis of one index. Similarly, odds ratios of having cardiometabolic risk features were noticeably increased in subjects classified as overweight or obese by both measures when compared to study participants categorised by either BMI or WHtR separately. Significant discriminatory improvement was observed for detecting individual cardiometabolic risk features and adverse biomarker levels. In a fully adjusted model, only individuals within the highest tertile for both indices displayed a significant and positive association with pre-diabetes, OR: 3.4 (95 % CI: 1.9, 6.0), P < 0.001. Conclusions These data provide evidence that the use of BMI and WHtR together may improve body fat classification. Risk stratification using a composite index may provide a more accurate method for identifying high and low-risk subjects.