Diagnostic yield in adults screened at the marfan outpatient clinic using the 1996 and 2010 ghent nosologies

Marfan syndrome (MFS) is diagnosed according to the Ghent nosology, which has recently been revised. In the Netherlands, evaluation for possible MFS is performed in specialized Marfan outpatient clinics. We investigated the diagnostic yield in our clinic and the impact of the 2010 nosology. All adul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A Vol. 158A; no. 5; pp. 982 - 988
Main Authors Aalberts, Jan J.J., Thio, Chris H.L., Schuurman, Agnes G., van Langen, Irene M., van der Pol, Bert A.E., van Tintelen, J. Peter, van den Berg, Maarten P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.05.2012
Wiley-Liss
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1552-4825
1552-4833
1552-4833
DOI10.1002/ajmg.a.35343

Cover

More Information
Summary:Marfan syndrome (MFS) is diagnosed according to the Ghent nosology, which has recently been revised. In the Netherlands, evaluation for possible MFS is performed in specialized Marfan outpatient clinics. We investigated the diagnostic yield in our clinic and the impact of the 2010 nosology. All adult patients (n = 343) who visited our clinic between 1998 and 2008 were included. We analyzed their reasons for referral, characteristics, and established diagnoses. In addition, we applied the 2010 nosology to all patients and compared the outcomes to those obtained with the 1996 nosology. Diagnoses that were made using the 1996 and the 2010 Ghent nosology included MFS (44/343 vs. 47/343), familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and/or dissection (22/343 vs. 22/343 patients), Loeys–Dietz syndrome (4/343 vs. 4/343 patients), and (familial) mitral valve prolapse (MVPS; 5/343 vs. 28/343 patients). In both nosologies, 77% of MFS patients had an FBN1 mutation. The 2010 nosology led to an increase in the number of diagnoses made: 4 additional cases of MFS were identified (one patient was “lost” who no longer fulfilled the criteria) and 23 additional cases of MVPS were diagnosed. The diagnostic yield of patients with aortic root dilatation was 65% using the 1996 nosology and 70% using the 2010 nosology. The change in diagnoses did not lead to a difference in clinical follow‐up. We conclude that the diagnostic yield of our specialized clinic was high, in particular in patients with aortic root dilatation. Further more the 2010 Ghent nosology led to a significant increase in the number of diagnoses made, mainly due to lowering of the diagnostic threshold for MVPS. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-NCZXLKSH-R
ArticleID:AJMG35343
istex:1140C5C9D1D5C2C8FCB709EDDBCAA8840F31D387
How to Cite this Article: Aalberts JJJ, Thio CHL, Schuurman AG, van Langen IM, van der Pol BAE, van Tintelen JP, van den Berg MP. 2012. Diagnostic yield in adults screened at the Marfan outpatient clinic using the 1996 and 2010 Ghent nosologies. Am J Med Genet Part A. 158A:982-988.
How to Cite this Article: Aalberts JJJ, Thio CHL, Schuurman AG, van Langen IM, van der Pol BAE, van Tintelen JP, van den Berg MP. 2012. Diagnostic yield in adults screened at the Marfan outpatient clinic using the 1996 and 2010 Ghent nosologies. Am J Med Genet Part A. 158A:982–988.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1552-4825
1552-4833
1552-4833
DOI:10.1002/ajmg.a.35343