Luteal supplementation in in vitro fertilization: more questions than answers

To update clinicians on different regimens of luteal phase supplementation in IVF-stimulated cycles and to identify areas that need further research in this subject. Literature review and critical analysis of published studies on luteal phase supplementation during the last 20 years. Luteal phase su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFertility and sterility Vol. 89; no. 4; pp. 749 - 758
Main Authors Hubayter, Ziad R., Muasher, Suheil J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.04.2008
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0015-0282
1556-5653
1556-5653
DOI10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.095

Cover

More Information
Summary:To update clinicians on different regimens of luteal phase supplementation in IVF-stimulated cycles and to identify areas that need further research in this subject. Literature review and critical analysis of published studies on luteal phase supplementation during the last 20 years. Luteal phase supplementation in IVF-stimulated cycles, both in gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and antagonist protocols, is considered an essential requirement for optimal success rates. The date of initiation and discontinuation of supplemented hormones is not adequately studied in the literature. In most major controlled and randomized studies, there are no significant differences in success rates with progesterone supplementation alone, progesterone and estradiol, progesterone and human chorionic gonadotropin, and human chorionic gonadotropin alone. Success rates seem similar with intramuscular and vaginal progesterone administration with patient preference for the vaginal route. The optimal dose of progesterone has not been studied in a scientific way in the literature. The use of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists for luteal phase supplementation in antagonist cycles appears to be promising, and is worthy of further investigation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0015-0282
1556-5653
1556-5653
DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.095