Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: interdisciplinary perspectives

In this paper, inspired by the plenary panel at the 2013 meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, Dr. Steven Southwick (chair) and multidisciplinary panelists Drs. George Bonanno, Ann Masten, Catherine Panter-Brick, and Rachel Yehuda tackle some of the most pressing current...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of psychotraumatology Vol. 5; no. 1; pp. 1 - 14
Main Authors Southwick, Steven M., Bonanno, George A., Masten, Ann S., Panter-Brick, Catherine, Yehuda, Rachel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Taylor & Francis 01.10.2014
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Co-Action Publishing
Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2000-8066
2000-8066
DOI10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338

Cover

More Information
Summary:In this paper, inspired by the plenary panel at the 2013 meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, Dr. Steven Southwick (chair) and multidisciplinary panelists Drs. George Bonanno, Ann Masten, Catherine Panter-Brick, and Rachel Yehuda tackle some of the most pressing current questions in the field of resilience research including: (1) how do we define resilience, (2) what are the most important determinants of resilience, (3) how are new technologies informing the science of resilience, and (4) what are the most effective ways to enhance resilience? These multidisciplinary experts provide insight into these difficult questions, and although each of the panelists had a slightly different definition of resilience, most of the proposed definitions included a concept of healthy, adaptive, or integrated positive functioning over the passage of time in the aftermath of adversity. The panelists agreed that resilience is a complex construct and it may be defined differently in the context of individuals, families, organizations, societies, and cultures. With regard to the determinants of resilience, there was a consensus that the empirical study of this construct needs to be approached from a multiple level of analysis perspective that includes genetic, epigenetic, developmental, demographic, cultural, economic, and social variables. The empirical study of determinates of resilience will inform efforts made at fostering resilience, with the recognition that resilience may be enhanced on numerous levels (e.g., individual, family, community, culture).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Responsible Editors: Ananda Amstadter, Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, VA, USA; Nicole Nugent, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, RI, USA.
This paper is part of the Special Issue: Resilience and Trauma. More papers from this issue can be found at http://www.eurojnlofpsychotraumatol.net
For the abstract or full text in other languages, please see Supplementary files under Article Tools online
ISSN:2000-8066
2000-8066
DOI:10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338