Identifying tests to evaluate in a diagnostic accuracy study for patients with vertigo in general practice: a Delphi study

• Published in: BMC family practice Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 238 - 12
• Main Authors: Leemeyer, Anna-Marie R., Ross, Andrew K., Bruintjes, Tjasse D., Cals, Jochen W.L., van Leeuwen, Roeland B., Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I., van Vugt, Vincent A., Maarsingh, Otto R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 02.08.2025; BioMed Central Ltd; Springer Nature B.V; BMC
• Subjects: Accuracy; Accuracy and precision; Agreements; Analysis; Care and treatment; Consensus; Delphi method; Delphi Technique; Diagnosis; Diagnostic tests; Dizziness; Family Medicine; Feedback; General Practice; Humans; Medical tests; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Motivation; Netherlands; Otolaryngology; Patients; Prevalence studies (Epidemiology); Primary Care Medicine; Primary Health Care; Sensitivity analysis; Vertigo; Vertigo - diagnosis; Vertigo - etiology; Netherlands; Dizziness; General practice; Primary Health Care; Delphi technique; Vertigo; Consensus
• ISSN: 2731-4553; 2731-4553; 1471-2296
• DOI: 10.1186/s12875-025-02920-z

Introduction Vertigo is a common symptom that strongly impacts patients’ quality of life. More than 80% of patients experiencing vertigo are primarily treated by their general practitioner (GP). The GP’s'diagnostic toolkit' for vertigo has serious limitations, though, because diagnostic accuracy studies on conditions that may cause vertigo have never been performed in a general practice setting. Our aim was to determine which tests should be investigated in a diagnostic accuracy study for patients with vertigo in general practice. Method We conducted an online Delphi procedure involving national and international experts. The experts were asked to judge a selection of 40 diagnostic tests based on the Dutch GP guideline on vestibular symptoms, supplemented by tests identified during a systematic review. Panellists were allowed to suggest additional tests after the first round. In case of consensus of at least 70%, a test was included or excluded. We also conducted a secondary sub-analysis of our Delphi procedure to demonstrate non-dominance of Dutch experts within our expert panel. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. Results A panel of 20 experts from five countries, including 7 specialists in otolaryngology, 6 neurologists and 7 GPs, participated in the Delphi procedure. The panel judged 46 diagnostic tests in total, with 6 additional tests added to the original selection based on suggestions by experts. After the first two rounds (100% response rate), 16 tests were included, 22 tests were excluded and no consensus was reached on 8 tests. During the consensus round, one of the 8 tests was added to the included 16 tests. Of these 17 tests, 15 are recommended by the Dutch GP guideline, supplemented by the non-recommended Tandem walking test and the Romberg test. Conclusions An international expert panel reached consensus on 17 tests for vertigo in general practice that should be investigated in a diagnostic accuracy study.