Patience and time consistency in collective decisions

We present experimental evidence regarding individual and group decisions over time. Static and longitudinal methods are combined to test four conditions on time preferences: impatience, stationarity, age independence, and dynamic consistency. Decision making in groups should favor coordination via...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inExperimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 181 - 208
Main Authors Denant-Boemont, Laurent, Diecidue, Enrico, l’Haridon, Olivier
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.03.2017
Springer Nature B.V
Springer Verlag (Germany)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1386-4157
1573-6938
1573-6938
DOI10.1007/s10683-016-9481-4

Cover

More Information
Summary:We present experimental evidence regarding individual and group decisions over time. Static and longitudinal methods are combined to test four conditions on time preferences: impatience, stationarity, age independence, and dynamic consistency. Decision making in groups should favor coordination via communication about voting intentions. We find that individuals are neither patient nor consistent, that groups are both patient and highly consistent, and that information exchange between participants helps groups converge to stable decisions. Finally we provide additional evidence showing that our results are driven by the specific role of groups and not by either repeated choices or individual preferences when choosing for other subjects.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1386-4157
1573-6938
1573-6938
DOI:10.1007/s10683-016-9481-4