Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthy blood donors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction The development of a potent immune response and antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 is important for herd immunity. The serological response may be due to a previous infection or vaccination. Healthy blood donors could represent and provide information on the immune status of the general popu...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC public health Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 2925 - 18 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central
22.10.2024
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1471-2458 1471-2458 |
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-024-20364-5 |
Cover
Summary: | Introduction
The development of a potent immune response and antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 is important for herd immunity. The serological response may be due to a previous infection or vaccination. Healthy blood donors could represent and provide information on the immune status of the general population. Therefore, we estimated the global and regional prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthy blood donors.
Methods
We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest from December 2019 to January 2023. After critical appraisal and quality assessment, a qualitative synthesis of the identified relevant articles was performed. The
random-effects
model was used to estimate the
pooled prevalence
of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.
Funnel plots
and
Egger
’s test were used to assess publication bias. Sensitivity analysis was performed, and heterogeneity was quantified using
I
2
statistics
.
Results
A total of 70 peer-reviewed articles were selected that together included 2,454,192 blood donors. The global estimated
pooled prevalence
of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthy blood donors was 10.3% (95% CI: 4.6 – 18.0%,
n
= 70). The highest seroprevalence was observed in Asia (17.7%), followed by Africa (16.1%). The seroprevalence in studies conducted
before
the introduction of the vaccine was 6.1%, whereas those of studies conducted
after
vaccines were available was 27.6%. High seroprevalence was observed in studies that measured antibodies against the
S protein
of the virus (15.2%), while lower (12.5%) in those that measured antibodies against the
N protein
. A high seroprevalence was observed in studies that only measured IgG antibodies (16.3%), and it was 5.9% in studies that measured total antibodies.
Conclusion
The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthy blood donors varies, potentially indicating geographical disparities in transmission and vaccination rates. To enhance community resilience, addressing these differences through inclusive health policies and adaptable public health measures is crucial. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 1471-2458 1471-2458 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12889-024-20364-5 |