Safety and efficacy of viramidine versus ribavirin in ViSER2: Randomized, double-blind study in therapy-naive hepatitis C patients

Pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (standard of care for chronic hepatitis C virus [HCV]), can cause dose-limiting anemia in up to 22% of patients. Viramidine is associated with a lower incidence of anemia because of its liver-targeting properties. The efficacy and safety of viramidine ve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of hepatology Vol. 52; no. 1; pp. 32 - 38
Main Authors Marcellin, Patrick, Gish, Robert G., Gitlin, Norman, Heise, Jamie, Halliman, Deanine G., Chun, Eric, Rodriguez-Torres, Maribel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier B.V 01.01.2010
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0168-8278
1600-0641
1600-0641
DOI10.1016/j.jhep.2009.10.015

Cover

More Information
Summary:Pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (standard of care for chronic hepatitis C virus [HCV]), can cause dose-limiting anemia in up to 22% of patients. Viramidine is associated with a lower incidence of anemia because of its liver-targeting properties. The efficacy and safety of viramidine versus ribavirin plus peg-IFN alfa-2a was assessed in patients with HCV. Randomized patients received peg-IFN alfa-2a 180 mcg with viramidine 600mg twice daily or weight-based doses of ribavirin 1000 or 1200mg/day. Treatment duration was based on HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) genotype: genotype 2/3 and non-2/3 patients were treated for 24 and 48weeks, respectively. The primary efficacy end point was the non-inferiority of viramidine versus ribavirin (proportion of patients achieving sustained virologic response at week 24). The primary safety end point was the proportion of patients experiencing a hemoglobin event. In total, 962 patients received peg-IFN alfa-2a with viramidine (n=644) or ribavirin (n=318). Sustained virologic response was achieved in 40% of viramidine-treated patients and 55% of ribavirin-treated patients (difference of proportions 0.150 [95% CI, 0.09, 0.21]). Improved efficacy was seen with higher viramidine exposure on a mg/kg basis. Viramidine was significantly superior to ribavirin in hemoglobin event rates (54% vs. 80%; p<0.001). Adverse event rates were similar between groups except for diarrhea (viramidine 29.5%; ribavirin 15.7%; p<0.0001). Viramidine 600mg BID did not meet the primary efficacy non-inferiority end point but met the safety end point. Determination of a viramidine dosage that would yield superior efficacy over ribavirin is needed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0168-8278
1600-0641
1600-0641
DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2009.10.015