musculoskeletal system of humans is not tuned to maximize the economy of locomotion

Humans are known to have energetically optimal walking and running speeds at which the cost to travel a given distance is minimized. We hypothesized that "optimal" walking and running speeds would also exist at the level of individual locomotor muscles. Additionally, because humans are 60–...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 108; no. 46; pp. 18631 - 18636
Main Authors Carrier, David R, Anders, Christoph, Schilling, Nadja
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 15.11.2011
National Acad Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI10.1073/pnas.1105277108

Cover

More Information
Summary:Humans are known to have energetically optimal walking and running speeds at which the cost to travel a given distance is minimized. We hypothesized that "optimal" walking and running speeds would also exist at the level of individual locomotor muscles. Additionally, because humans are 60–70% more economical when they walk than when they run, we predicted that the different muscles would exhibit a greater degree of tuning to the energetically optimal speed during walking than during running. To test these hypotheses, we used electromyography to measure the activity of 13 muscles of the back and legs over a range of walking and running speeds in human subjects and calculated the cumulative activity required from each muscle to traverse a kilometer. We found that activity of each of these muscles was minimized at specific walking and running speeds but the different muscles were not tuned to a particular speed in either gait. Although humans are clearly highly specialized for terrestrial locomotion compared with other great apes, the results of this study indicate that our locomotor muscles are not tuned to specific walking or running speeds and, therefore, do not maximize the economy of locomotion. This pattern may have evolved in response to selection to broaden the range of sustainable running speeds, to improve performance in motor behaviors not related to endurance locomotion, or in response to selection for both.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
Author contributions: D.R.C., C.A., and N.S. designed research; D.R.C., C.A., and N.S. performed research; C.A. and N.S. analyzed data; and D.R.C., C.A., and N.S. wrote the paper.
Edited by C. Owen Lovejoy, Kent State University, Kent, OH, and approved October 7, 2011 (received for review April 9, 2011)
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1105277108