A longitudinal study of risk and protective factors for symptoms of adjustment disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic caused multiple stressors that may lead to symptoms of adjustment disorder. We longitudinally examined relationships between risk and protective factors, pandemic-related stressors and symptoms of adjustment disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as whether these relati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of psychotraumatology Vol. 15; no. 1; p. 2318944
Main Authors Lotzin, Annett, Stahlmann, Katharina, Acquarini, Elena, Ajdukovic, Dean, Ajdukovic, Marina, Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous, Xenia, Ardino, Vittoria, Bondjers, Kristina, Bragesjö, Maria, Böttche, Maria, Dragan, Małgorzata, Figueiredo-Braga, Margarida, Gelezelyte, Odeta, Grajewski, Piotr, Javakhishvili, Jana Darejan, Kazlauskas, Evaldas, Lenferink, Lonneke, Lioupi, Chrysanthi, Lueger-Schuster, Brigitte, Mooren, Trudy, Sales, Luisa, Tsiskarishvili, Lela, Novakovic, Irina Zrnic, Schäfer, Ingo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Taylor & Francis 2024
Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2000-8066
2000-8198
2000-8066
DOI10.1080/20008066.2024.2318944

Cover

More Information
Summary:The COVID-19 pandemic caused multiple stressors that may lead to symptoms of adjustment disorder. We longitudinally examined relationships between risk and protective factors, pandemic-related stressors and symptoms of adjustment disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as whether these relationships differed by the time of assessment. The European Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS) ADJUST Study included = 15,169 participants aged 18 years and above. Participants from 11 European countries were recruited and screened three times at 6-month intervals from June 2020 to January 2022. Associations between risk and protective factors (e.g. gender), stressors (e.g. fear of infection), and symptoms of adjustment disorder (AjD, ADNM-8) and their interaction with time of assessment were examined using mixed linear regression. The following predictors were significantly associated with higher AjD symptom levels: female or diverse gender; older age; pandemic-related news consumption >30 min a day; a current or previous mental health disorder; trauma exposure before or during the pandemic; a good, satisfactory or poor health status (vs. very good); burden related to governmental crisis management and communication; fear of infection; restricted social contact; work-related problems; restricted activity; and difficult housing conditions. The following predictors were associated with lower AjD levels: self-employment or retirement; working in healthcare; and face-to-face contact ≥ once a week with loved ones or friends. The effects of the following predictors on AjD symptoms differed by the time of assessment in the course of the pandemic: a current or previous mental disorder; burden related to governmental crisis management; income reduction; and a current trauma exposure. We identified risk factors and stressors predicting AjD symptom levels at different stages of the pandemic. For some predictors, the effects on mental health may change at different stages of a pandemic.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Aleksandra Stevanovic, Department of Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Croatia
Xenia Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous, Psychology Program, School of Ηumanities, Social Sciences and Law, University of Nicosia
Evaldas Kazlauskas, Center for Psychotraumatology, Institute of Psychology, Vilnius University, Lithuania
Maria Bragesjö, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for psychiatric research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Nino Makhashvili, Institute of Addiction Studies, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
Lonneke I.M. Lenferink, Department of Psychology, Health, & Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management, and Social Sciences, University of Twente, The Netherlands
Małgorzata Dragan, Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
Irina Zrnic Novakovic, Unit of Psychotraumatology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria
Vittoria Ardino, DISCUI, University of Urbino, Italy
Margarida Figueiredo-Braga, Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal; Trauma Observatory, Centre for Social Studies (CES), University of Coimbra, Portugal, & Unit of Psychiatry, Hospital Militar, Coimbra, Portugal
Ingo Schäfer, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
Annett Lotzin, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Psychology, MSH Medical School Hamburg
Filip Arnberg, National Centre for Disaster Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Chrysanthi Lioupi, Psychology Program, School of Ηumanities, Social Sciences and Law, University of Nicosia
ADJUST Consortium
Piotr Grajewski, Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
Luisa Sales, Trauma Observatory, Centre for Social Studies (CES), University of Coimbra, Portugal & Unit of Psychiatry, Hospital Militar, Coimbra, Portugal; Unit of Psychiatry, Hospital Militar, Coimbra, Portugal
Dean Ajdukovic, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Croatia
Brigitte Lueger-Schuster, Unit of Psychotraumatology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria
Trudy Mooren, Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
Elena Acquarini, DISCUI, University of Urbino, Italy
Odeta Gelezelyte, Center for Psychotraumatology, Institute of Psychology, Vilnius University, Lithuania
Jana Darejan Javakhishvili, Institute of Addiction Studies, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
ISSN:2000-8066
2000-8198
2000-8066
DOI:10.1080/20008066.2024.2318944