Neural Representations of Emotion Are Organized around Abstract Event Features
Research on emotion attribution has tended to focus on the perception of overt expressions of at most five or six basic emotions. However, our ability to identify others’ emotional states is not limited to perception of these canonical expressions. Instead, we make fine-grained inferences about what...
Saved in:
| Published in | Current biology Vol. 25; no. 15; pp. 1945 - 1954 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
03.08.2015
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0960-9822 1879-0445 1879-0445 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.009 |
Cover
| Summary: | Research on emotion attribution has tended to focus on the perception of overt expressions of at most five or six basic emotions. However, our ability to identify others’ emotional states is not limited to perception of these canonical expressions. Instead, we make fine-grained inferences about what others feel based on the situations they encounter, relying on knowledge of the eliciting conditions for different emotions. In the present research, we provide convergent behavioral and neural evidence concerning the representations underlying these concepts. First, we find that patterns of activity in mentalizing regions contain information about subtle emotional distinctions conveyed through verbal descriptions of eliciting situations. Second, we identify a space of abstract situation features that well captures the emotion discriminations subjects make behaviorally and show that this feature space outperforms competing models in capturing the similarity space of neural patterns in these regions. Together, the data suggest that our knowledge of others’ emotions is abstract and high dimensional, that brain regions selective for mental state reasoning support relatively subtle distinctions between emotion concepts, and that the neural representations in these regions are not reducible to more primitive affective dimensions such as valence and arousal.
•Patterns in ToM brain regions represent subtle emotion attributions•These emotion attributions are well captured by a space of abstract event features•This space outperforms competitors in capturing representations in ToM regions•These neural representations are not reducible to primitive dimensions like valence
Skerry and Saxe find patterns of neural activity representing fine-grained emotional attributions, well captured by a space of abstract event features. These findings show that it is possible to characterize the detailed representational structure of an essential human reasoning capacity—the ability to infer the emotional states of others. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 0960-9822 1879-0445 1879-0445 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.009 |