Detection of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Classification Using Resting State Functional Network Connectivity and Fractional Anisotropy

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) may adversely affect a person's thinking, memory, personality, and behavior. While mild TBI (mTBI) diagnosis is challenging, there is a risk for long-term psychiatric, neurologic, and psychosocial problems in some patients that motivates the search for new and bette...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurotrauma Vol. 34; no. 5; pp. 1045 - 1053
Main Authors Vergara, Victor M., Mayer, Andrew R., Damaraju, Eswar, Kiehl, Kent A., Calhoun, Vince
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.03.2017
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0897-7151
1557-9042
1557-9042
DOI10.1089/neu.2016.4526

Cover

More Information
Summary:Traumatic brain injury (TBI) may adversely affect a person's thinking, memory, personality, and behavior. While mild TBI (mTBI) diagnosis is challenging, there is a risk for long-term psychiatric, neurologic, and psychosocial problems in some patients that motivates the search for new and better biomarkers. Recently, diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) has shown promise in detecting mTBI, but its validity is still being investigated. Resting state functional network connectivity (rsFNC) is another approach that is emerging as a promising option for the diagnosis of mTBI. The present work investigated the use of rsFNC for mTBI detection compared with dMRI results on the same cohort. Fifty patients with mTBI (25 males) and age-sex matched healthy controls were recruited. Features from dMRI were obtained using all voxels, the enhanced Z-score microstructural assessment for pathology, and the distribution corrected Z-score. Features based on rsFNC were obtained through group independent component analysis and correlation between pairs of resting state networks. A linear support vector machine was used for classification and validated using leave-one-out cross validation. Classification achieved a maximum accuracy of 84.1% for rsFNC and 75.5% for dMRI and 74.5% for both combined. A t test analysis revealed significant increase in rsFNC between cerebellum versus sensorimotor networks and between left angular gyrus versus precuneus in subjects with mTBI. These outcomes suggest that inclusion of both common and unique information is important for classification of mTBI. Results also suggest that rsFNC can yield viable biomarkers that might outperform dMRI and points to connectivity to the cerebellum as an important region for the detection of mTBI.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0897-7151
1557-9042
1557-9042
DOI:10.1089/neu.2016.4526