Disrupting gender norms in health systems: making the case for change

Restrictive gender norms and gender inequalities are replicated and reinforced in health systems, contributing to gender inequalities in health. In this Series paper, we explore how to address all three through recognition and then with disruptive solutions. We used intersectional feminist theory to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Lancet (British edition) Vol. 393; no. 10190; pp. 2535 - 2549
Main Authors Hay, Katherine, McDougal, Lotus, Percival, Valerie, Henry, Sarah, Klugman, Jeni, Wurie, Haja, Raven, Joanna, Shabalala, Fortunate, Fielding-Miller, Rebecca, Dey, Arnab, Dehingia, Nabamallika, Morgan, Rosemary, Atmavilas, Yamini, Saggurti, Niranjan, Yore, Jennifer, Blokhina, Elena, Huque, Rumana, Barasa, Edwine, Bhan, Nandita, Kharel, Chandani, Silverman, Jay G, Raj, Anita, Darmstadt, Gary L, Greene, Margaret Eleanor, Hawkes, Sarah, Heise, Lori, Heymann, Jody, Levine, Ruth, Rao Gupta, Geeta
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 22.06.2019
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0140-6736
1474-547X
1474-547X
DOI10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30648-8

Cover

More Information
Summary:Restrictive gender norms and gender inequalities are replicated and reinforced in health systems, contributing to gender inequalities in health. In this Series paper, we explore how to address all three through recognition and then with disruptive solutions. We used intersectional feminist theory to guide our systematic reviews, qualitative case studies based on lived experiences, and quantitative analyses based on cross-sectional and evaluation research. We found that health systems reinforce patients' traditional gender roles and neglect gender inequalities in health, health system models and clinic-based programmes are rarely gender responsive, and women have less authority as health workers than men and are often devalued and abused. With regard to potential for disruption, we found that gender equality policies are associated with greater representation of female physicians, which in turn is associated with better health outcomes, but that gender parity is insufficient to achieve gender equality. We found that institutional support and respect of nurses improves quality of care, and that women's empowerment collectives can increase health-care access and provider responsiveness. We see promise from social movements in supporting women's reproductive rights and policies. Our findings suggest we must view gender as a fundamental factor that predetermines and shapes health systems and outcomes. Without addressing the role of restrictive gender norms and gender inequalities within and outside health systems, we will not reach our collective ambitions of universal health coverage and the Sustainable Development Goals. We propose action to systematically identify and address restrictive gender norms and gender inequalities in health systems.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Members of the Steering Committee are listed at the end of this Series paper
KH and AR led conceptualisation and drafting of the paper. AD led the study on nurses in Uttar Pradesh, ND the study on accredited social health activists in Uttar Pradesh, HW and JR the study on community health workers and community health worker policy in Sierra Leone, LM, JK, and AR the study on gender parity in the global physician workforce, and KH, YA, and NS the study on self-help groups in India. FS and RF-M led development of the case on the nurse from eSwatini. VP, RH, and EBa did the systematic literature review on health systems models. JGS and AR led the systematic review on gender transformative clinical interventions. KH, LM, JK, FS, RF-M, AD, YA, JY, EBl, NB, JGS, and AR did the critical reviews of the literature on gender inequalities and gender norms affecting health and helped draft pieces of those reviews, with consideration of diverse geographic contexts. All authors offered critical inputs and reviews of this work, contributed intellectual and substantive revisions to the writing, and provided final approval of the submitted version.
Contributors
ISSN:0140-6736
1474-547X
1474-547X
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30648-8