Knee instability after acute ACL rupture affects movement patterns during the mid-stance phase of gait

The purpose of this study was to identify gait asymmetries during the mid‐stance phase of gait among subjects with knee instability (“non‐copers”) after acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Twenty‐one non‐copers with acute, isolated ACL injury ambulated at their intentional walking speed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of orthopaedic research Vol. 25; no. 10; pp. 1369 - 1377
Main Authors Hurd, Wendy J., Snyder-Mackler, Lynn
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.10.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0736-0266
1554-527X
1554-527X
DOI10.1002/jor.20440

Cover

More Information
Summary:The purpose of this study was to identify gait asymmetries during the mid‐stance phase of gait among subjects with knee instability (“non‐copers”) after acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Twenty‐one non‐copers with acute, isolated ACL injury ambulated at their intentional walking speed as kinetic, kinematic, and electromyographic (EMG) data were collected bilaterally. Lower extremity movement patterns and muscle activity were analyzed during the mid‐stance and weight acceptance phases of stance. When compared to the uninjured limb, subjects exhibited lower sagittal plane knee excursions and peak knee angles, and higher muscle co‐contraction on the injured limb. There was a lower knee flexion moment at peak knee extension, a trend for the knee contribution to the total support moment to be lower, and a higher ankle contribution to the total support moment on the injured limb. There were differences in the magnitude of muscle activity which included higher hamstring activity and lower soleus activity on the injured limb. Changes in quadriceps, soleus, and hamstring muscle activity on the injured limb were identified during weight acceptance that had not previously been reported, while hip compensation for a lower knee contribution to the total support moment has been described. Non‐copers consistently stabilize their knee with a stiffening strategy involving less knee motion and higher muscle contraction. The variable combination of muscle adaptations that produce joint stiffness, and the ability of both the ankle and the hip to compensate for lower knee control indicate the non‐coper neuromuscular system may be more malleable than previously believed. © 2007 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 25:1369–1377, 2007
Bibliography:ArticleID:JOR20440
istex:78882527A1B686FCC74B4C8831144AC7D43952B7
ark:/67375/WNG-T43KLB13-T
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0736-0266
1554-527X
1554-527X
DOI:10.1002/jor.20440