The good, the bad, and the average Evidence on ability peer effects in schools

We study ability peer effects in English secondary schools using data on four cohorts of students taking age-14 national tests and measuring peers’ ability by prior achievements at age 11. Our identification is based on within-pupil regressions exploiting variation in achievements across three compu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of labor economics Vol. 30; no. 2; pp. 367 - 414
Main Authors Lavy, Victor, Silva, Olmo, Weinhardt, Felix
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chicago University of Chicago Press 01.04.2012
Univ. of Chicago Press
University of Chicago, acting through its Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0734-306X
1537-5307
DOI10.1086/663592

Cover

More Information
Summary:We study ability peer effects in English secondary schools using data on four cohorts of students taking age-14 national tests and measuring peers’ ability by prior achievements at age 11. Our identification is based on within-pupil regressions exploiting variation in achievements across three compulsory subjects tested at age 14 and age 11. Using this novel strategy, we find significant and sizable negative effects arising from bad peers at the bottom of the ability distribution but little evidence that average peer quality and good peers matter. However, these results are heterogeneous, with girls benefiting from academically bright peers and boys not.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0734-306X
1537-5307
DOI:10.1086/663592