Archetypal landscapes for deep neural networks

The predictive capabilities of deep neural networks (DNNs) continue to evolve to increasingly impressive levels. However, it is still unclear how training procedures for DNNs succeed in finding parameters that produce good results for such high-dimensional and nonconvex loss functions. In particular...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 117; no. 36; pp. 21857 - 21864
Main Authors Verpoort, Philipp C., Lee, Alpha A., Wales, David J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 08.09.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI10.1073/pnas.1919995117

Cover

More Information
Summary:The predictive capabilities of deep neural networks (DNNs) continue to evolve to increasingly impressive levels. However, it is still unclear how training procedures for DNNs succeed in finding parameters that produce good results for such high-dimensional and nonconvex loss functions. In particular, we wish to understand why simple optimization schemes, such as stochastic gradient descent, do not end up trapped in local minima with high loss values that would not yield useful predictions. We explain the optimizability of DNNs by characterizing the local minima and transition states of the loss-function landscape (LFL) along with their connectivity. We show that the LFL of a DNN in the shallow network or data-abundant limit is funneled, and thus easy to optimize. Crucially, in the opposite low-data/deep limit, although the number of minima increases, the landscape is characterized by many minima with similar loss values separated by low barriers. This organization is different from the hierarchical landscapes of structural glass formers and explains why minimization procedures commonly employed by the machine-learning community can navigate the LFL successfully and reach low-lying solutions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PMCID: PMC7486703
Author contributions: P.C.V., A.A.L., and D.J.W. designed the study and interpreted the results; P.C.V. and D.J.W. performed the numerical studies; and P.C.V., A.A.L., and D.J.W. wrote the paper.
Edited by David L. Donoho, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved July 7, 2020 (received for review November 15, 2019)
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1919995117