Arguing against the proposed definition changes of PD
ABSTRACT As members of the Lewy Body Dementia Association Scientific Advisory Council, we aim to address some of the issues raised in the article titled “Time to Redefine PD? Introductory Statement of the MDS Task Force on the Definition of Parkinson's Disease.” In particular, we suggest that t...
Saved in:
Published in | Movement disorders Vol. 31; no. 11; pp. 1619 - 1622 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.11.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0885-3185 1531-8257 1531-8257 |
DOI | 10.1002/mds.26721 |
Cover
Summary: | ABSTRACT
As members of the Lewy Body Dementia Association Scientific Advisory Council, we aim to address some of the issues raised in the article titled “Time to Redefine PD? Introductory Statement of the MDS Task Force on the Definition of Parkinson's Disease.” In particular, we suggest that the 1‐year rule distinguishing Parkinson's disease dementia from dementia with Lewy bodies is worth maintaining because it serves an important purpose in clinical practice and clinical and basic science research and when helping the lay community understand the complexity of these different clinical phenotypes. Furthermore, we believe that adding an additional diagnostic label, “PD (dementia with Lewy bodies subtype),” will confuse rather than clarify the distinction between dementia with Lewy bodies and PD or PD dementia, and will not improve management or expedite therapeutic development. We present arguments supporting our contentions. © 2016 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:7DDEA5ADFD12D4B896123B9FB1D530B1875702B9 ark:/67375/WNG-GMQ57D7D-N ArticleID:MDS26721 The copyright line for this article was changed on 4 November 2016 after original online publication. Nothing to report. Relevant conflicts of interests/financial disclosures ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Commentary-3 content type line 23 Relevant conflicts of interests/financial disclosures: Nothing to report. |
ISSN: | 0885-3185 1531-8257 1531-8257 |
DOI: | 10.1002/mds.26721 |