Analyzing postprandial metabolomics data using multiway models: a simulation study
Background Analysis of time-resolved postprandial metabolomics data can improve the understanding of metabolic mechanisms, potentially revealing biomarkers for early diagnosis of metabolic diseases and advancing precision nutrition and medicine. Postprandial metabolomics measurements at several time...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC bioinformatics Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 94 - 22 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central
04.03.2024
BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1471-2105 1471-2105 |
DOI | 10.1186/s12859-024-05686-w |
Cover
Summary: | Background
Analysis of time-resolved postprandial metabolomics data can improve the understanding of metabolic mechanisms, potentially revealing biomarkers for early diagnosis of metabolic diseases and advancing precision nutrition and medicine. Postprandial metabolomics measurements at several time points from multiple subjects can be arranged as a
subjects
by
metabolites
by
time points
array. Traditional analysis methods are limited in terms of revealing subject groups, related metabolites, and temporal patterns simultaneously from such three-way data.
Results
We introduce an unsupervised multiway analysis approach based on the CANDECOMP/PARAFAC (CP) model for improved analysis of postprandial metabolomics data guided by a simulation study. Because of the lack of ground truth in real data, we generate simulated data using a comprehensive human metabolic model. This allows us to assess the performance of CP models in terms of revealing subject groups and underlying metabolic processes. We study three analysis approaches: analysis of
fasting-state
data using principal component analysis,
T0-corrected
data (i.e., data corrected by subtracting fasting-state data) using a CP model and
full-dynamic
(i.e., full postprandial) data using CP. Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate that CP models capture meaningful and stable patterns from simulated meal challenge data, revealing underlying mechanisms and differences between diseased versus healthy groups.
Conclusions
Our experiments show that it is crucial to analyze both
fasting-state
and
T0-corrected
data for understanding metabolic differences among subject groups. Depending on the nature of the subject group structure, the best group separation may be achieved by CP models of
T0-corrected
or
full-dynamic
data. This study introduces an improved analysis approach for postprandial metabolomics data while also shedding light on the debate about correcting baseline values in longitudinal data analysis. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1471-2105 1471-2105 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12859-024-05686-w |