A Randomized Trial of Nighttime Physician Staffing in an Intensive Care Unit
In this single-center, controlled trial at a U.S. academic medical center, investigators found that having in-house intensivists available at night did not have a significant effect on the length of stay in the ICU. Most studies suggest that intensivist physicians improve patient outcomes in intensi...
Saved in:
Published in | The New England journal of medicine Vol. 368; no. 23; pp. 2201 - 2209 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Waltham, MA
Massachusetts Medical Society
06.06.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0028-4793 1533-4406 1533-4406 |
DOI | 10.1056/NEJMoa1302854 |
Cover
Summary: | In this single-center, controlled trial at a U.S. academic medical center, investigators found that having in-house intensivists available at night did not have a significant effect on the length of stay in the ICU.
Most studies suggest that intensivist physicians improve patient outcomes in intensive care units (ICUs).
1
–
3
It is thus tempting to conclude that a “dose–response effect” might exist, such that greater exposure to intensivists would be associated with even better outcomes.
4
Indeed, some authors argue that 24-hour presence of seasoned intensivists at the bedside of patients would improve diagnostic and therapeutic efficiency, particularly for high-risk patients.
5
–
7
As a result, many ICUs, including one third of academic ICUs in the United States
8
and nearly three quarters of ICUs in Europe,
9
,
10
use in-hospital intensivist staffing at night.
Before-and-after studies of nighttime . . . |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa1302854 |