Initial recommendations for performing, benchmarking and reporting single-cell proteomics experiments
Analyzing proteins from single cells by tandem mass spectrometry (MS) has recently become technically feasible. While such analysis has the potential to accurately quantify thousands of proteins across thousands of single cells, the accuracy and reproducibility of the results may be undermined by nu...
Saved in:
Published in | Nature methods Vol. 20; no. 3; pp. 375 - 386 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Nature Publishing Group US
01.03.2023
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1548-7091 1548-7105 1548-7105 |
DOI | 10.1038/s41592-023-01785-3 |
Cover
Summary: | Analyzing proteins from single cells by tandem mass spectrometry (MS) has recently become technically feasible. While such analysis has the potential to accurately quantify thousands of proteins across thousands of single cells, the accuracy and reproducibility of the results may be undermined by numerous factors affecting experimental design, sample preparation, data acquisition and data analysis. We expect that broadly accepted community guidelines and standardized metrics will enhance rigor, data quality and alignment between laboratories. Here we propose best practices, quality controls and data-reporting recommendations to assist in the broad adoption of reliable quantitative workflows for single-cell proteomics. Resources and discussion forums are available at
https://single-cell.net/guidelines
.
A community of researchers working in the emerging field of single-cell proteomics propose best-practice experimental and computational recommendations and reporting guidelines for studies analyzing proteins from single cells by mass spectrometry. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Instructional Material/Guideline-2 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Review-4 content type line 23 N.S. initiated and organized discussions and writing. N.S., A.M.F. and L.G. prepared a first draft. N.S., C.V., J.D., A.L. and L.G. made figures. All authors edited, read and approved the paper. Author contributions |
ISSN: | 1548-7091 1548-7105 1548-7105 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41592-023-01785-3 |