Identification of robust deep neural network models of longitudinal clinical measurements

Deep learning (DL) from electronic health records holds promise for disease prediction, but systematic methods for learning from simulated longitudinal clinical measurements have yet to be reported. We compared nine DL frameworks using simulated body mass index (BMI), glucose, and systolic blood pre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNPJ digital medicine Vol. 5; no. 1; pp. 106 - 11
Main Authors Javidi, Hamed, Mariam, Arshiya, Khademi, Gholamreza, Zabor, Emily C., Zhao, Ran, Radivoyevitch, Tomas, Rotroff, Daniel M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 27.07.2022
Nature Publishing Group
Nature Portfolio
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2398-6352
2398-6352
DOI10.1038/s41746-022-00651-4

Cover

More Information
Summary:Deep learning (DL) from electronic health records holds promise for disease prediction, but systematic methods for learning from simulated longitudinal clinical measurements have yet to be reported. We compared nine DL frameworks using simulated body mass index (BMI), glucose, and systolic blood pressure trajectories, independently isolated shape and magnitude changes, and evaluated model performance across various parameters (e.g., irregularity, missingness). Overall, discrimination based on variation in shape was more challenging than magnitude. Time-series forest-convolutional neural networks (TSF-CNN) and Gramian angular field(GAF)-CNN outperformed other approaches ( P  < 0.05) with overall area-under-the-curve (AUCs) of 0.93 for both models, and 0.92 and 0.89 for variation in magnitude and shape with up to 50% missing data. Furthermore, in a real-world assessment, the TSF-CNN model predicted T2D with AUCs reaching 0.72 using only BMI trajectories. In conclusion, we performed an extensive evaluation of DL approaches and identified robust modeling frameworks for disease prediction based on longitudinal clinical measurements.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2398-6352
2398-6352
DOI:10.1038/s41746-022-00651-4