A phase II study of talimogene laherparepvec for patients with inoperable locoregional recurrence of breast cancer
Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is an immunotherapy that generates local tumor lysis and systemic antitumor immune response. We studied the efficacy of intratumoral administration of T-VEC as monotherapy for inoperable locoregional recurrence of breast cancer. T-VEC was injected intratumorally at 1...
Saved in:
Published in | Scientific reports Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 22242 - 8 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
15.11.2021
Nature Publishing Group Nature Portfolio |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-021-01473-2 |
Cover
Summary: | Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is an immunotherapy that generates local tumor lysis and systemic antitumor immune response. We studied the efficacy of intratumoral administration of T-VEC as monotherapy for inoperable locoregional recurrence of breast cancer. T-VEC was injected intratumorally at 10
6
PFU/mL on day 1 (cycle 1), 10
8
PFU/mL on day 22 (cycle 2), and 10
8
PFU/mL every 2 weeks thereafter (cycles ≥ 3). Nine patients were enrolled, 6 with only locoregional disease and 3 with both locoregional and distant disease. No patient completed the planned 10 cycles or achieved complete or partial response. The median number of cycles administered was 4 (range, 3–8). Seven patients withdrew prematurely because of uncontrolled disease progression, 1 withdrew after cycle 3 because of fatigue, and 1 withdrew after cycle 4 for reasons unrelated to study treatment. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 77 days (95% CI, 63–NA) and 361 days (95% CI, 240–NA). Two patients received 8 cycles with clinically stable disease as the best response. The most common grade 2 or higher adverse event was injection site reaction (n = 7, 78%). Future studies could examine whether combining intratumoral T-VEC with concurrent systemic therapy produces better outcomes. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-021-01473-2 |