The advantages of metalenses over diffractive lenses

• Published in: Nature communications Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 1991 - 4
• Main Authors: Engelberg, Jacob, Levy, Uriel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 24.04.2020; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 639/624/1075; 639/624/399/1015; 639/624/400/1103; 639/925/927/1021; Comment; Diffractive optics; Humanities and Social Sciences; Lenses; Miniaturization; Missile systems; Missiles; multidisciplinary; New technology; Optical components; Optics; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Substrates
• ISSN: 2041-1723; 2041-1723
• DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15972-9

Optical elements play a crucial role in many modern systems, from cellphones to missiles. The miniaturization trend poses a challenge to optics, since classical lenses and mirrors tend to be bulky. One way of dealing with this challenge is using flat optics. For many years flat optics has been implemented using diffractive optics technology, but in the last two decades a new technology called metasurfaces has emerged. This technology does not replace diffractive optics, but rather expands on it, leveraging the new ability to manufacture subwavelength features on optical substrates. For imaging and focusing applications, diffractive lenses and metalenses are used, as a subset of diffractive optics and metasurfaces, respectively. Recently there has been debate over whether metalenses offer any real advantages over diffractive lenses. In this commentary we will try to gain some insight into this debate and present our opinion on the subject.