The important risk factor for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis of lower rectal cancer is node-positive status on magnetic resonance imaging: study of the Lymph Node Committee of Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum

Purpose This study seeks to evaluate lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) and perirectal lymph node (PRLN) status on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as potential risk factors for lymph node metastasis. Methods The subjects were 394 patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent MRI prior to mesorectal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of colorectal disease Vol. 31; no. 10; pp. 1719 - 1728
Main Authors Ogawa, Shimpei, Hida, Jin-ichi, Ike, Hideyuki, Kinugasa, Tetsushi, Ota, Mitsuyoshi, Shinto, Eiji, Itabashi, Michio, Okamoto, Takahiro, Sugihara, Kenichi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.10.2016
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0179-1958
1432-1262
1432-1262
DOI10.1007/s00384-016-2641-3

Cover

More Information
Summary:Purpose This study seeks to evaluate lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) and perirectal lymph node (PRLN) status on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as potential risk factors for lymph node metastasis. Methods The subjects were 394 patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent MRI prior to mesorectal excision (combined with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in 272 patients) at 6 institutes. No patients received neoadjuvant therapy. Cases were classified as cN(+) and cN(−) based on the short axis of the largest lymph node ≥5 and <5 mm, respectively. LPLN and PRLN status and other clinicopathologic factors were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. The importance of identified risk factors for lymph node metastasis was examined using the area under the curve (AUC). Results Independent risk factors for right LPLN metastasis included histopathological grade (G3 + G4), pPRLN(+), M1, cLPLN(+) [odds ratio (OR) 10.73, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 4.59–27.1], and those for left LPLN metastasis were age (<64), histopathological grade (G3 + G4), pPRLN(+), and cLPLN(+) (OR 24.53, 95 % CI 9.16–77.7). ORs for cLPLN(+) were highest. The AUCs for right and left cLPLN status of 0.7484 (95 % CI 0.6672–0.8153) and 0.7904 (95 % CI 0.7088–0.8538), respectively, were significantly higher than those for other risk factors. In contrast, the ORs for cPRLN(+) and cPRLN status of 2.46 (95 % CI 1.47–4.18) and 0.6396 (95 % CI 0.5917–0.6848) were not much higher than for other factors. Conclusions An LPLN-positive status with a short axis ≥5 mm on MRI is an important predictor of LPLN metastasis, but PRLN status is not a strong predictor of PRLN metastasis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0179-1958
1432-1262
1432-1262
DOI:10.1007/s00384-016-2641-3