Pooled testing for COVID-19 diagnosis by real-time RT-PCR: A multi-site comparative evaluation of 5- & 10-sample pooling

Background & objectives: Public health and diagnostic laboratories are facing huge sample loads for COVID-19 diagnosis by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). High sensitivity of optimized real-time RT-PCR assays makes pooled testing a potentially efficient strateg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIndian journal of medical research (New Delhi, India : 1994) Vol. 152; no. 1; pp. 88 - 94
Main Authors Praharaj, Ira, Jain, Amita, Singh, Mini, Balakrishnan, Anukumar, Dhodapkar, Rahul, Borkakoty, Biswajyoti, Ashok, Munivenkatappa, Das, Pradeep, Biswas, Debasis, Kalawat, Usha, Turuk, Jyotirmayee, Sugunan, A, Prakash, Shantanu, Singh, Anirudh, Barathidasan, Rajamani, Subhadra, Subhra, Sabat, Jyotsnamayee, Manjunath, M, Kanta, Poonam, Mudhigeti, Nagaraja, Hazarika, Rahul, Mishra, Hricha, Abhishek, Kumar, Santhalembi, C, Dikhit, Manas, Vijay, Neetu, Narayan, Jitendra, Kaur, Harmanmeet, Giri, Sidhartha, Gupta, Nivedita
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published India Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd 01.07.2020
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
Scientific Scholar
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0971-5916
0975-9174
DOI10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2304_20

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background & objectives: Public health and diagnostic laboratories are facing huge sample loads for COVID-19 diagnosis by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). High sensitivity of optimized real-time RT-PCR assays makes pooled testing a potentially efficient strategy for resource utilization when positivity rates for particular regions or groups of individuals are low. We report here a comparative analysis of pooled testing for 5- and 10-sample pools by real-time RT-PCR across 10 COVID-19 testing laboratories in India. Methods: Ten virus research and diagnostic laboratories (VRDLs) testing for COVID-19 by real-time RT-PCR participated in this evaluation. At each laboratory, 100 nasopharyngeal swab samples including 10 positive samples were used to create 5- and 10-sample pools with one positive sample in each pool. RNA extraction and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2-specific E gene target were performed for individual positive samples as well as pooled samples. Concordance between individual sample testing and testing in the 5- or 10-sample pools was calculated, and the variation across sites and by sample cycle threshold (Ct) values was analyzed. Results: A total of 110 each of 5- and 10-sample pools were evaluated. Concordance between the 5-sample pool and individual sample testing was 100 per cent in the Ct value ≤30 cycles and 95.5 per cent for Ctvalues ≤33 cycles. Overall concordance between the 5-sample pooled and individual sample testing was 88 per cent while that between 10-sample pool and individual sample testing was 66 per cent. Although the concordance rates for both the 5- and 10-sample pooled testing varied across laboratories, yet for samples with Ct values ≤33 cycles, the concordance was ≥90 per cent across all laboratories for the 5-sample pools. Interpretation & conclusions: Results from this multi-site assessment suggest that pooling five samples for SARS-CoV-2 detection by real-time RT-PCR may be an acceptable strategy without much loss of sensitivity even for low viral loads, while with 10-sample pools, there may be considerably higher numbers of false negatives. However, testing laboratories should perform validations with the specific RNA extraction and RT-PCR kits in use at their centres before initiating pooled testing.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0971-5916
0975-9174
DOI:10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2304_20