Hydro-ecological linkages in urbanizing watersheds: An empirical assessment of in-stream nitrate loss and evidence of saturation kinetics

We examined the effect of discharge on in‐stream NO3− loss for a suburban stream in Maryland and addressed two questions: (1) How important is in‐stream nitrogen removal in this biogeoclimatic setting? (2) Is there evidence of saturation kinetics? We conducted the study in a 2.4 km forested stream s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres Vol. 114; no. G4
Main Authors Claessens, Luc, Tague, Christina L., Band, Lawrence E., Groffman, Peter M., Kenworthy, Stephen T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC Blackwell Publishing Ltd 03.12.2009
American Geophysical Union
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0148-0227
2169-8953
2156-2202
2156-2202
2169-8961
DOI10.1029/2009JG001017

Cover

More Information
Summary:We examined the effect of discharge on in‐stream NO3− loss for a suburban stream in Maryland and addressed two questions: (1) How important is in‐stream nitrogen removal in this biogeoclimatic setting? (2) Is there evidence of saturation kinetics? We conducted the study in a 2.4 km forested stream section, over a period of drought and wet conditions (2001–2004). We calculated NO3− loss from monthly and seasonal mass balances and constructed NO3− loss duration curves. NO3− loss was fairly constant across flow regimes, averaging 0.8 g N ha−1 d−1 per unit watershed area. Proportional NO3− loss (relative to transport) reached 96% at low flows and converged to 0% at high flows. Duration curve analysis showed that proportional NO3− loss was generally low, averaging 6% loss, and only 5% of the time exceeded 22% loss. We extrapolated NO3− removal to the 3.8 km2 watershed. In‐stream NO3− removal corresponded to only 2% of watershed nitrogen inputs and 3% of total losses. Our results suggest that for urbanizing watersheds subject to high nitrogen inputs, in‐stream processing has only a limited potential for reducing watershed nitrogen export. We examined whether NO3− loss patterns showed evidence of saturation kinetics. Estimates of water travel time were used to calculate first‐order NO3− loss metrics. NO3− loss first‐order rate constant (Kc) was negatively related with NO3− concentration. This evidence of saturation kinetics suggests that the common use of first‐order process models is not valid in streams subject to high nitrogen inputs, requiring the need for higher‐order process models.
Bibliography:istex:764C5831240550C1531A46E8B86EA7ABF832EA65
ArticleID:2009JG001017
ark:/67375/WNG-FK430M80-M
Tab-delimited Table 1.Tab-delimited Table 2.
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0148-0227
2169-8953
2156-2202
2156-2202
2169-8961
DOI:10.1029/2009JG001017