Deep learning system for lymph node quantification and metastatic cancer identification from whole-slide pathology images

Background Traditional diagnosis methods for lymph node metastases are labor-intensive and time-consuming. As a result, diagnostic systems based on deep learning (DL) algorithms have become a hot topic. However, current research lacks testing with sufficient data to verify performance. The aim of th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Vol. 24; no. 4; pp. 868 - 877
Main Authors Hu, Yajie, Su, Feng, Dong, Kun, Wang, Xinyu, Zhao, Xinya, Jiang, Yumeng, Li, Jianming, Ji, Jiafu, Sun, Yu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore Springer Singapore 01.07.2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1436-3291
1436-3305
1436-3305
DOI10.1007/s10120-021-01158-9

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background Traditional diagnosis methods for lymph node metastases are labor-intensive and time-consuming. As a result, diagnostic systems based on deep learning (DL) algorithms have become a hot topic. However, current research lacks testing with sufficient data to verify performance. The aim of this study was to develop and test a deep learning system capable of identifying lymph node metastases. Methods 921 whole-slide images of lymph nodes were divided into two cohorts: training and testing. For lymph node quantification, we combined Faster RCNN and DeepLab as a cascade DL algorithm to detect regions of interest. For metastatic cancer identification, we fused Xception and DenseNet-121 models and extracted features. Prospective testing to verify the performance of the diagnostic system was performed using 327 unlabeled images. We further validated the proposed system using Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) criteria. Results We developed a DL-based system capable of automated quantification and identification of metastatic lymph nodes. The accuracy of lymph node quantification was shown to be 97.13%. The PPV of the combined Xception and DenseNet-121 model was 93.53%, and the NPV was 97.99%. Our experimental results show that the differentiation level of metastatic cancer affects the recognition performance. Conclusions The diagnostic system we established reached a high level of efficiency and accuracy of lymph node diagnosis. This system could potentially be implemented into clinical workflow to assist pathologists in making a preliminary screening for lymph node metastases in gastric cancer patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1436-3291
1436-3305
1436-3305
DOI:10.1007/s10120-021-01158-9