A new non-linear normalization method for reducing variability in DNA microarray experiments

Microarray data are subject to multiple sources of variation, of which biological sources are of interest whereas most others are only confounding. Recent work has identified systematic sources of variation that are intensity-dependent and non-linear in nature. Systematic sources of variation are no...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGenome biology Vol. 3; no. 9; pp. research0048 - 467
Main Authors Workman, Christopher, Jensen, Lars Juhl, Jarmer, Hanne, Berka, Randy, Gautier, Laurent, Nielser, Henrik Bjørn, Saxild, Hans-Henrik, Nielsen, Claus, Brunak, Søren, Knudsen, Steen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central 30.08.2002
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1474-760X
1465-6906
1474-7596
1474-760X
1465-6914
DOI10.1186/gb-2002-3-9-research0048

Cover

More Information
Summary:Microarray data are subject to multiple sources of variation, of which biological sources are of interest whereas most others are only confounding. Recent work has identified systematic sources of variation that are intensity-dependent and non-linear in nature. Systematic sources of variation are not limited to the differing properties of the cyanine dyes Cy(5) and Cy(3) as observed in cDNA arrays, but are the general case for both oligonucleotide microarray (Affymetrix GeneChips) and cDNA microarray data. Current normalization techniques are most often linear and therefore not capable of fully correcting for these effects. We present here a simple and robust non-linear method for normalization using array signal distribution analysis and cubic splines. These methods compared favorably to normalization using robust local-linear regression (lowess). The application of these methods to oligonucleotide arrays reduced the relative error between replicates by 5-10% compared with a standard global normalization method. Application to cDNA arrays showed improvements over the standard method and over Cy(3)-Cy(5) normalization based on dye-swap replication. In addition, a set of known differentially regulated genes was ranked higher by the t-test. In either cDNA or Affymetrix technology, signal-dependent bias was more than ten times greater than the observed print-tip or spatial effects. Intensity-dependent normalization is important for both high-density oligonucleotide array and cDNA array data. Both the regression and spline-based methods described here performed better than existing linear methods when assessed on the variability of replicate arrays. Dye-swap normalization was less effective at Cy(3)-Cy(5) normalization than either regression or spline-based methods alone.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1474-760X
1465-6906
1474-7596
1474-760X
1465-6914
DOI:10.1186/gb-2002-3-9-research0048