Prostate-specific antigen kinetics following external-beam radiotherapy and temporary (Ir-192) or permanent (I-125) brachytherapy for prostate cancer
The aim of the study was the evaluation of PSA kinetics after different radiotherapy methods. Two-hundred and ninety five patients received external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT; 70.2 Gy; n = 135), Ir-192 brachytherapy as a boost to EBRT (HDR-BT; 18 Gy + 50.4 Gy; n = 66) or I-125 brachytherapy (LDR-BT; 1...
Saved in:
Published in | Radiotherapy and oncology Vol. 96; no. 1; pp. 25 - 29 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Ireland
Elsevier Ireland Ltd
01.07.2010
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0167-8140 1879-0887 1879-0887 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.02.010 |
Cover
Summary: | The aim of the study was the evaluation of PSA kinetics after different radiotherapy methods.
Two-hundred and ninety five patients received external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT; 70.2
Gy;
n
=
135), Ir-192 brachytherapy as a boost to EBRT (HDR-BT; 18
Gy
+
50.4
Gy;
n
=
66) or I-125 brachytherapy (LDR-BT; 145
Gy;
n
=
94) as monotherapy. “PSA bounce” was defined as a PSA rise of ⩾0.2
ng/ml followed by spontaneous return to prebounce level or lower, biochemical failure as “nadir
+
2
ng/ml”.
Patients without biochemical failure reached a lower nadir after brachytherapy (median ⩽0.05
ng/ml after LDR- and HDR-BT without NHT) in comparison to EBRT (0.55
ng/ml without NHT;
p
<
0.01). Not a single patient without NHT and a nadir <0.1
ng/ml failed biochemically (0% vs. 45% with a nadir ⩾0.1
ng/ml;
p
<
0.01). PSA bounces were found predominantly in the LDR-BT group (42% vs. 23%/20% after HDR-BT/EBRT;
p
<
0.01). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, LDR-BT and HDR-BT were associated with a significantly lower biochemical failure rate in comparison to EBRT.
PSA kinetics differ significantly following different radiotherapy methods. A lower nadir and a higher biochemical control rate suggest a higher radiobiological efficiency of brachytherapy in comparison to EBRT (with a dose of 70.2
Gy). |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0167-8140 1879-0887 1879-0887 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.02.010 |