Rationale for use of the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes as a primary outcome measure for Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials

Abstract Background We used the database of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) to explore the psychometric properties of the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) to consider its utility as an outcome measure for clinical trials in early and mild, as well as later,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAlzheimer's & dementia Vol. 9; no. 1; pp. S45 - S55
Main Authors Cedarbaum, Jesse M, Jaros, Mark, Hernandez, Chito, Coley, Nicola, Andrieu, Sandrine, Grundman, Michael, Vellas, Bruno
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.02.2013
The Alzheimer's Association
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1552-5260
1552-5279
1552-5279
DOI10.1016/j.jalz.2011.11.002

Cover

More Information
Summary:Abstract Background We used the database of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) to explore the psychometric properties of the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) to consider its utility as an outcome measure for clinical trials in early and mild, as well as later, stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods We assessed internal consistency, structural validity, convergent validity, and 2-year internal and external responsiveness of the CDR-SB using data from 382 subjects with early or mild AD at entry into the ADNI study. Results The CDR-SB assesses both cognitive and functional domains of AD disability. Mean scores declined nearly linearly; CDR-SB cognitive and functional subsums contributed equally to total scores at both very mild (early) and mild stages of the disease. Conclusions The CDR-SB has psychometric properties that make it attractive as a primary outcome measure that comprehensively assesses both cognitive and functional disability in AD patients. It may prove particularly useful for studies in early, predementia stages of AD.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1552-5260
1552-5279
1552-5279
DOI:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.11.002