Parallel profiling of immune infiltrate subsets in uveal melanoma versus cutaneous melanoma unveils similarities and differences: A pilot study

The low response rates to immunotherapy in uveal melanoma (UM) sharply contrast with reputable response rates in cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients. To characterize the mechanisms responsible for resistance to immunotherapy in UM, we performed immune profiling in tumors from 10 metastatic UM patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOncoimmunology Vol. 6; no. 6; p. e1321187
Main Authors Qin, Yong, Petaccia de Macedo, Mariana, Reuben, Alexandre, Forget, Marie-Andrée, Haymaker, Cara, Bernatchez, Chantale, Spencer, Christine N., Gopalakrishnan, Vancheswaran, Reddy, Sujan, Cooper, Zachary A., Fulbright, Orenthial J., Ramachandran, Renjith, Wahl, Arely, Flores, Esteban, Thorsen, Shawne T., Tavera, Rene J., Conrad, Claudius, Williams, Michelle D., Tetzlaff, Michael T., Wang, Wei-Lien, Gombos, Dan S., Esmaeli, Bita, Amaria, Rodabe N., Hwu, Patrick, Wargo, Jennifer A., Lazar, Alexander J., Patel, Sapna P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Taylor & Francis 03.06.2017
Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2162-402X
2162-4011
2162-402X
DOI10.1080/2162402X.2017.1321187

Cover

More Information
Summary:The low response rates to immunotherapy in uveal melanoma (UM) sharply contrast with reputable response rates in cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients. To characterize the mechanisms responsible for resistance to immunotherapy in UM, we performed immune profiling in tumors from 10 metastatic UM patients and 10 metastatic CM patients by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Although there is no difference in infiltrating CD8 + T cells between UM and CM, a significant decrease in programmed death-1 (PD-1)-positive lymphocytes was observed and lower levels of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) in UM metastases compared with CM metastases. Tumors from metastatic UM patients showed a lower success rate of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) growth compared with metastatic CM (45% vs. 64% success), with a significantly lower quantity of UM TIL expanded overall. These studies suggest that UM and CM are immunologically distinct, and provide potential explanation for the impaired success of immunotherapy in UM.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Now at MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD 20878 USA.
These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.
ISSN:2162-402X
2162-4011
2162-402X
DOI:10.1080/2162402X.2017.1321187