Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation
A major challenge exists in assessing the risk of developing cancer from exposures to low-dose radiation — which are encountered during diagnostic scans, for example. What factors influence low-dose cancer risk and what might this mean for current protection measures? Ionizing radiation is considere...
Saved in:
Published in | Nature reviews. Cancer Vol. 9; no. 8; pp. 596 - 604 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
01.08.2009
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1474-175X 1474-1768 1474-1768 |
DOI | 10.1038/nrc2677 |
Cover
Summary: | A major challenge exists in assessing the risk of developing cancer from exposures to low-dose radiation — which are encountered during diagnostic scans, for example. What factors influence low-dose cancer risk and what might this mean for current protection measures?
Ionizing radiation is considered a non-threshold carcinogen. However, quantifying the risk of the more commonly encountered low and/or protracted radiation exposures remains problematic and subject to uncertainty. Therefore, a major challenge lies in providing a sound mechanistic understanding of low-dose radiation carcinogenesis. This Perspective article considers whether differences exist between the effects mediated by high- and low-dose radiation exposure and how this affects the assessment of low-dose cancer risk. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Review-2 |
ISSN: | 1474-175X 1474-1768 1474-1768 |
DOI: | 10.1038/nrc2677 |