Improved cerebrospinal fluid suppression for intracranial vessel wall MRI

Purpose To develop and assess a three‐dimensional (3D) high resolution black blood MRI (BBMRI) method for evaluation of intracranial vessels with improved cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) suppression. Materials and Methods The anti‐driven‐equilibrium (ADE) pulse was incorporated into a variable flip‐angle...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 44; no. 3; pp. 665 - 672
Main Authors Yang, Huan, Zhang, Xuefeng, Qin, Qin, Liu, Li, Wasserman, Bruce A., Qiao, Ye
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1053-1807
1522-2586
1522-2586
DOI10.1002/jmri.25211

Cover

More Information
Summary:Purpose To develop and assess a three‐dimensional (3D) high resolution black blood MRI (BBMRI) method for evaluation of intracranial vessels with improved cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) suppression. Materials and Methods The anti‐driven‐equilibrium (ADE) pulse was incorporated into a variable flip‐angle TSE‐based 3D BBMRI to improve CSF suppression. ADE‐BBMRI was optimized in 8 participants and compared with BBMRI, with acquired 0.5 mm isotropic resolution and scan time of 5.4 min at 3 Tesla. Contrast‐enhanced ADE‐BBMRI protocol was implemented in nine patients with intracranial atherosclerosis. Signal and morphological measurements were compared between ADE‐BBMRI and BBMRI, as well as pre‐ and postcontrast ADE‐BBMRI. Reliability was assessed by intraclass correlations (ICC). Results ADE‐BBMRI effectively suppressed the surrounding CSF signal of intracranial vessels, with a 36–44% reduction compared with BBMRI. ADE‐BBMRI also reduced the overall wall signal by 8–8.5%, but provided a significant improvement in wall‐to‐CSF contrast‐to‐noise ratio over BBMRI (middle cerebral artery, 5.93 ± 0.59 versus 3.95 ± 1.67, P < 0.01; basilar artery, 3.8 ± 1.76 versus 1.34 ± 0.54, P = 0.01, respectively). No differences were noted in morphological measurements between ADE‐BBMRI and BBMRI (lumen area, 6.35 ± 2.87 versus 6.32 ± 2.84 mm2; wall area, 1.28 ± 0.52 versus 1.27 ± 0.53 mm2; mean wall thickness, 0.93 ± 0.30 versus 0.93 ± 0.32 mm; maximum wall thickness, 1.27 ± 0.33 versus 1.28 ± 0.36 mm, all P > 0.05). Contrast enhanced ADE‐BBMRI improved the plaque delineation by the increased wall signal, wall‐to‐CSF and wall‐to‐blood contrast‐to‐noise ratio. ICC ranged from 0.54 to 0.95. Conclusion The 3D ADE‐BBMRI provides excellent blood and CSF suppression, and accurate measurements of intracranial vessels at 0.5 mm isotropic resolution in 5 min. Its clinical application may provide insight into stroke risk. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:665–672.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-GFW74N4W-7
NIH - No. R00HL106232; No. K25 HL121192
ArticleID:JMRI25211
istex:7C2F4CA6F6A3879C1C19D8EBC726895A8CA9C54A
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.25211