Distribution of lipoprotein (a) levels in patients with lower extremity artery disease and their impact on amputation and survival: a retrospective study

Background Elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) is an independent risk factor for lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) with equivocal effect on amputation and mortality. Results regarding aggressive lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) are missing. We examined LEAD patients with Lp(a) measurement and the imp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLipids in health and disease Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 128 - 11
Main Authors Gebauer, Katrin, Malyar, Nasser M., Varghese, Julian, Reinecke, Holger, Brix, Tobias J., Engelbertz, Christiane
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 02.04.2025
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1476-511X
1476-511X
DOI10.1186/s12944-025-02542-5

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background Elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) is an independent risk factor for lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) with equivocal effect on amputation and mortality. Results regarding aggressive lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) are missing. We examined LEAD patients with Lp(a) measurement and the impact of intensive LLT on amputation and survival. Methods Baseline characteristics of 263 LEAD patients with Lp(a) measurement treated in a tertiary hospital from 01/2017 until 01/2022 were recorded. Patients were categorized into three groups according to their Lp(a) values (< 30 mg/dL, 30–90 mg/dL and > 90 mg/dL). Lipid values and LLT were recorded at baseline and during follow-up (median 750 days). Peripheral endovascular revascularizations (EVR), amputations and death during follow-up were analysed. Results Of 263 patients, 75% were male, mean age was 67 ± 10 years. Elevated Lp(a) values ≥ 30 mg/dL were found in 32%, 16% had values > 90 mg/dL. Baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was 89 ± 38 mg/dL, decreasing to 61 ± 30 mg/dL at follow-up, with no difference between Lp(a) groups (63 ± 32 mg/dL vs. 52 ± 23 mg/dL vs. 60 ± 25 mg/dL, p  = 0.273). Statin dose was intensified more frequently in those with elevated Lp(a) (16% vs. 35% vs. 33%, p  = 0.005), who also received significantly more often ezetimibe (50% vs. 58% vs. 73%, p  = 0.028) and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (2% vs. 3% vs. 8%, p  = 0.043). No difference was seen regarding EVR (91% vs. 95% vs. 90%, p  = 0.729), amputations (4% vs. 7% vs. 0%, p  = 0.245) and death (8% vs. 5% vs. 3%, p  = 0.436). Conclusions Aggressive LLT in high-risk LEAD patients with elevated Lp(a) levels enabled LDL-C target achievement in a majority by combination of established lipid-lowering agents. An increase in EVR, amputation or death could not be observed in patients with high Lp(a) levels.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1476-511X
1476-511X
DOI:10.1186/s12944-025-02542-5