Development and acceptability testing of a tracheostomy decision support video for parents

• Published in: PEC innovation Vol. 7; p. 100412
• Main Authors: Kukora, Stephanie K., Ryan, Kerry, Yan, Haoyang, Clarke, Rachel, Arslanian-Engoren, Cynthia, Pituch, Kenneth
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.12.2025; Elsevier
• Subjects: Decision education; Decision-support tool; Internal Medicine; Pediatric tracheostomy; Public Health; Shared decision-making; Tracheostomy education; Tracheostomy education; Pediatric tracheostomy; Decision-support tool; Decision education; Shared decision-making
• ISSN: 2772-6282; 2772-6282
• DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100412

To develop a clinical, bedside intervention with peer parent narratives to help parents understand the shared decision-making (SDM) process, their role in the decision, and other parents' considerations in this context. To ensure that the intervention reflected parents' needs, we identified eight parents who had faced a tracheostomy decision for their child and were willing to talk about their experiences on a video recording. Half of the parents had chosen tracheostomy; some children of parents making either choice had died. We included parents of diverse racial backgrounds whose children had different diagnoses. Parent interviews, along with an explanation of SDM for parents, were edited into a 17-min video guided by iterative feedback from parents and clinicians. Additional parents of children with tracheostomies then viewed the video and shared perceptions about acceptability. After an iterative process of developing the video in partnership with parents, we piloted the video with 18 parents in 16 online interviews (two were couples) who were not part of video development but had faced a tracheostomy decision for their child within the last three years. Participants were asked about their experiences, viewed the video, and provided verbal feedback and reflection on the acceptability of the video and its anticipated clinical use. Interviews were transcribed and qualitatively analyzed, focusing on feedback. Parents who viewed the video provided generally favorable feedback, describing the video as “helpful,” and appreciating the diversity of the cases represented and the perspectives offered. They felt that it could empower parents to ask questions and voice their opinions to the medical team. Parents noted feeling a connection to the emotions expressed by the parents in the video and felt it would help parents facing these decisions to feel less alone. Video education focusing on parents' perspectives may help support the SDM process for pediatric tracheostomy and complement other strategies to support parent engagement. Similar approaches may be valuable in explaining SDM to patients or families facing other serious decisions. •Population outcomes may be too heterogenous to provide tailored risk estimates for some interventions.•Traditional decision-aids may not inform individual patient decision-making for these decisions.•Other support tools informing patients of their role in decision-making may instead enhance engagement.•Parents found a video educating parents on the tracheostomy decision-making process acceptable and potentially helpful.