Classification techniques on computerized systems to predict and/or to detect Apnea: A systematic review

•We provide a comprehensive review of the existing state of the art of classification models for apnea.•We identify several limitations and open problems in the computerized decision for apnea.•A classification model should provide an auto-adaptive and no external-human action dependency.•The accura...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inComputer methods and programs in biomedicine Vol. 140; pp. 265 - 274
Main Authors Pombo, Nuno, Garcia, Nuno, Bousson, Kouamana
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.03.2017
Subjects
HI
AHI
BNN
LR
LVQ
AUC
PNN
MLR
EMG
ML
PSG
EEG
ROC
AI
CAS
BHC
ANN
RCT
SAS
PPG
FN
LDA
FP
KNN
SVM
SRN
VDA
NPV
RDI
PPV
MSA
EOG
OSA
ECG
HMM
TN
TP
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0169-2607
1872-7565
1872-7565
DOI10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.01.001

Cover

More Information
Summary:•We provide a comprehensive review of the existing state of the art of classification models for apnea.•We identify several limitations and open problems in the computerized decision for apnea.•A classification model should provide an auto-adaptive and no external-human action dependency.•The accuracy of the classification models is related with the effective features selection.•RCTs and validation of models using a large and multiple sample of data are recommended. Sleep apnea syndrome (SAS), which can significantly decrease the quality of life is associated with a major risk factor of health implications such as increased cardiovascular disease, sudden death, depression, irritability, hypertension, and learning difficulties. Thus, it is relevant and timely to present a systematic review describing significant applications in the framework of computational intelligence-based SAS, including its performance, beneficial and challenging effects, and modeling for the decision-making on multiple scenarios. This study aims to systematically review the literature on systems for the detection and/or prediction of apnea events using a classification model. Forty-five included studies revealed a combination of classification techniques for the diagnosis of apnea, such as threshold-based (14.75%) and machine learning (ML) models (85.25%). In addition, the ML models, were clustered in a mind map, include neural networks (44.26%), regression (4.91%), instance-based (11.47%), Bayesian algorithms (1.63%), reinforcement learning (4.91%), dimensionality reduction (8.19%), ensemble learning (6.55%), and decision trees (3.27%). A classification model should provide an auto-adaptive and no external-human action dependency. In addition, the accuracy of the classification models is related with the effective features selection. New high-quality studies based on randomized controlled trials and validation of models using a large and multiple sample of data are recommended.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ISSN:0169-2607
1872-7565
1872-7565
DOI:10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.01.001