Evaluation of aroma differences between high-salt liquid-state fermentation and low-salt solid-state fermentation soy sauces from China
•HLFSS exhibited a richer aromatic profile compared with LSFSS.•GC-O analysis of two Chinese soy sauces pointed out 33–37 odourant areas.•The individual odourant affects the whole sensory attributes in real food matrix. Two types of Chinese soy sauce, high-salt liquid-state fermentation soy sauce (H...
Saved in:
Published in | Food chemistry Vol. 145; pp. 126 - 134 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Kidlington
Elsevier Ltd
15.02.2014
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0308-8146 1873-7072 1873-7072 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.072 |
Cover
Summary: | •HLFSS exhibited a richer aromatic profile compared with LSFSS.•GC-O analysis of two Chinese soy sauces pointed out 33–37 odourant areas.•The individual odourant affects the whole sensory attributes in real food matrix.
Two types of Chinese soy sauce, high-salt liquid-state fermentation soy sauce (HLFSS) and low-salt solid-state fermentation soy sauce (LSFSS), were used to investigate their differences in aroma profile by headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and gas chromatography-olfactometry/mass spectrometry (GC-O/MS). Results from descriptive sensory analysis showed that the alcoholic, cooked potato-like and caramel-like attributes were significantly higher in HLFSS, while LSFSS exhibited significantly higher sour and burnt attributes. In addition, aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA) revealed 37 and 33 odour-active regions for HLFSS and LSFSS, respectively. Ethanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, phenylacetaldehyde, 4-ethyl-2-methoxyphenol, 2-methoxy-4-vinylphenol and 3-(methylthio)propanal detected in HLFSS showed the highest flavour dilution (FD) factors, while 3-methylbutanal, phenylacetaldehyde and ethyl propanoate possessed the highest FD factors in LSFSS. Therefore, the traditional Chinese soy sauce HLFSS contained more complex volatiles and exhibited a richer aromatic profile compared with LSFSS. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0308-8146 1873-7072 1873-7072 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.072 |